Page 1 of 1
Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Thu Dec 3, 2009 4:28 am
by greeeen_leeeeaf
I need to get a player that will give me ast, if I'm going to trade Frey right now, which player(s) will i be able to get for a 1 for 1 trade?
Re: Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Thu Dec 3, 2009 6:28 am
by DNYLkiller
you should shoot as high as possible. Westbrook and Calderon might be worth a shot
Re: Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Thu Dec 3, 2009 3:19 pm
by jorgo
Realistically, people will view Frye as about a 70-90 ranked player because his main contribution is 3 pointers which can be found in many places.
Like Harrington (who I have on two teams), he is a piece which despite holding a top 50 value, won't get you anything as good in return.
You can try for your Westbrooks, Calderons, Arenas'. But I'm thinking you'd have to settle for Brooks, Jameer Nelson, Tony Parker, Mario Chalmers, Stephen Curry.
Re: Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Thu Dec 3, 2009 9:29 pm
by Gus McCrae
Beasley/Frye trade just went down in my league
Re: Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Thu Dec 3, 2009 10:47 pm
by He Hate Me
Frye/Jamison went in mine.
Re: Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Fri Dec 4, 2009 1:00 am
by dklee13
He Hate Me wrote:Frye/Jamison went in mine.
Wow. I don't think I would have been able to let go of Jamison for Frye.
Re: Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Fri Dec 4, 2009 2:54 am
by creative1
Frye for Jamison should have been vetoed in any league. That's a ridiculously lopsided trade.
Re: Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Fri Dec 4, 2009 3:11 am
by jorgo
it's not as lopsided as you think.... Jamison's FT% is a category killer at the moment.
Re: Channing Frye - true value?
Posted: Fri Dec 4, 2009 6:12 am
by creative1
Don't be silly Jorgo. Just because Jamison's FT% is bad doesn't put him anywhere in the same league as Tawn. I think people that overlook dominant production because of FT% or TO's is crazy. Dwight Howard is a FT% cat killer... no way I would want that dude on my team... come on.