Non-Bird Extensions
Non-Bird Extensions
-
- Junior
- Posts: 411
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Non-Bird Extensions
I understand if a team chooses to extend a player's contract using his non-bird rights(1 season), they can up to as much of 120% of the player's previous salary. My question is when a player is playing under the minimum like Dwyane Wade, is it 120% of his actual minimum salary? Or is it 120% of his cap hit(2nd year player's minimum). I assume it would be his actual salary and not his cap hit but need clarification.
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,102
- And1: 227
- Joined: Aug 22, 2010
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
They get a cap exemption if they need one to go over the cap and offer up to 120% of his prior salary. The cap hold until signed would be his prior salary ie the minimum.
Note that if a player has non-bird (NQVFA) rights, they can't do an extension. They can perhaps re-sign after he becomes a free agent.
Note that if a player has non-bird (NQVFA) rights, they can't do an extension. They can perhaps re-sign after he becomes a free agent.
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
-
- Junior
- Posts: 411
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
DBoys wrote:They get a cap exemption if they need one to go over the cap and offer up to 120% of his prior salary. The cap hold until signed would be his prior salary ie the minimum.
Note that if a player has non-bird (NQVFA) rights, they can't do an extension. They can perhaps re-sign after he becomes a free agent.
Makes sense. I have one more question. What if the previous salary is pro-rated? Example Derrick Rose. Rose making about 500k this season because of pro-rated minimum. Let's say they want to use non-bird exception this off-season to resign him. Would it be 120% of his pro-rated salary?
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,102
- And1: 227
- Joined: Aug 22, 2010
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
To clarify on the earlier, plus the latest, the cap hit for a player who was at or below the minimum would be:
1 if a RFA, it's the QO amount
2 if UFA, it's usually going to be the 2-year veteran minimum (ie unreimbursed salary)
3 if experience is less than 2 year veteran and also UFA (which would be extremely rare), it would be applicable minimum salary
D Rose would be in category 2.
1 if a RFA, it's the QO amount
2 if UFA, it's usually going to be the 2-year veteran minimum (ie unreimbursed salary)
3 if experience is less than 2 year veteran and also UFA (which would be extremely rare), it would be applicable minimum salary
D Rose would be in category 2.
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
-
- Junior
- Posts: 411
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
Thank you DBoys, your help is appreciated. I actually feel my question was rather dumb the more I think about it. Don't know why I would I even think it would be 120% of his cap hit, as it is way less money then he actually made. I just wasn't thinking but see it now. Thanks again lol
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,981
- And1: 2,982
- Joined: Aug 09, 2017
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
DBoys wrote:They get a cap exemption if they need one to go over the cap and offer up to 120% of his prior salary. The cap hold until signed would be his prior salary ie the minimum.
Note that if a player has non-bird (NQVFA) rights, they can't do an extension. They can perhaps re-sign after he becomes a free agent.
Can you use Non-Bird Rights in a sign and trade?
Re: Non-Bird Extensions
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,102
- And1: 227
- Joined: Aug 22, 2010