Non-simultaneous trade and 3 way deals
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:29 pm
Is it possible to use a TPE generated from an earlier deal to eat salary as a part of subsequent 3-way deal?
For example, Houston just got a $6.3 million TPE from the recent 4 way deal that saw them send out Ariza, would the following deals be kosher (leaving aside questions of ?
1). Houston sends a 1st round pick to New Orleans; Orlando sends Gortat (making $6.3 mil) to Houston; New Orleans sends Ariza (also making $6.3 mil) to Orlando.
2) Houston sends 1st round pick to New Orleans; Clevland sends A. Parker and J. Moon (making $3 mil and 2.85 mil) to Houston, New Orleans sends Ariza to Cleveland.
My guess is that the first deal is kosher while the second deal is not. In the first one, essentially Houston uses its TPE to absorb Gortat's $6.3 mil salary, giving Orlando a $6.3 mil TPE, which it can then use to take on Ariza. In the second one, Houston absorbs Parker and Moon, but CLE gets a $3 mil TPE and another $2.8 mil TPE, neither of them is sufficient to absorb the Ariza's $6.3 mil salary.
Is this correct? If so, does it mean that any 3 or more party trades in which one party uses a TPE generated from an earlier deal must be viewed as several separate trades with one of these trades being a 2 party deal involving the TPE?
For example, Houston just got a $6.3 million TPE from the recent 4 way deal that saw them send out Ariza, would the following deals be kosher (leaving aside questions of ?
1). Houston sends a 1st round pick to New Orleans; Orlando sends Gortat (making $6.3 mil) to Houston; New Orleans sends Ariza (also making $6.3 mil) to Orlando.
2) Houston sends 1st round pick to New Orleans; Clevland sends A. Parker and J. Moon (making $3 mil and 2.85 mil) to Houston, New Orleans sends Ariza to Cleveland.
My guess is that the first deal is kosher while the second deal is not. In the first one, essentially Houston uses its TPE to absorb Gortat's $6.3 mil salary, giving Orlando a $6.3 mil TPE, which it can then use to take on Ariza. In the second one, Houston absorbs Parker and Moon, but CLE gets a $3 mil TPE and another $2.8 mil TPE, neither of them is sufficient to absorb the Ariza's $6.3 mil salary.
Is this correct? If so, does it mean that any 3 or more party trades in which one party uses a TPE generated from an earlier deal must be viewed as several separate trades with one of these trades being a 2 party deal involving the TPE?