Extension Salary Minimum
Posted: Thu Feb 7, 2013 11:12 pm
I've looked through this forum a bit, read through Larry Coon's FAQ and some of the 2005 CBA, and I've yet to find an answer (a sufficient one, anyway) to my question.
It's made clear that in the first year of the extended term in an extension, the maximum a player can receive is 107.5% of his salary in the last year of the original contract or the max, whichever is less. What is the minimum amount a player can receive in the first year of the extended portion of an extended contract? Is it 92.5% of his salary in the final year of the original contract or less? If it is 92.5% of the salary in the final year of the original contract, how was Steve Nash able to sign an extension in 2009 starting at 79% of his salary in the last year of his original contract (where, by the same rule, if such a rule exists, would have set a lower bound of 89.5%)? Is there no lower bound? Thanks.
It's made clear that in the first year of the extended term in an extension, the maximum a player can receive is 107.5% of his salary in the last year of the original contract or the max, whichever is less. What is the minimum amount a player can receive in the first year of the extended portion of an extended contract? Is it 92.5% of his salary in the final year of the original contract or less? If it is 92.5% of the salary in the final year of the original contract, how was Steve Nash able to sign an extension in 2009 starting at 79% of his salary in the last year of his original contract (where, by the same rule, if such a rule exists, would have set a lower bound of 89.5%)? Is there no lower bound? Thanks.