Kirilenko Question

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,587
And1: 19,697
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Kirilenko Question 

Post#1 » by shrink » Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:40 am

I think I may be making something more complicated than it is, so I was hoping someone could set me straight:

Kirlenko has played one season for MIN, coming over from Russia. He has a player-option for $10,219,420 next season, and is considering declining it in favor of a new contract. My questions:

1. This is a totally new contract, and not an extension on his current contract, correct? So the first year does not have to equal the amount that he's giving up by declining the player option, right?

2. Without cap space and the MLE probably too small, MIN would probably need to use the non-Bird exception.

Mr. Larry Coon wrote: This exception allows a team to re-sign its own free agent to a salary starting at up to 120% of his salary in the previous season (not over the maximum salary, of course), 120% of the minimum salary, or the amount needed to tender a qualifying offer (if the player is a restricted free agent -- see question number 43), whichever is greater. Raises are limited to 4.5% of the salary in the first year of the contract, and contracts are limited to four seasons when this exception is used.


I believe this passage talks about the most money and the most years that can be offered - are there any restrictions on making a smaller offer?

Thanks.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
DBoys
Starter
Posts: 2,103
And1: 228
Joined: Aug 22, 2010

Re: Kirilenko Question 

Post#2 » by DBoys » Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:10 am

Their exception to sign him would cover any deal starting at 0 - 120% of prior salary.

Return to CBA & Business