Designated player rule and the individual player max
Posted: Sun Sep 4, 2016 6:40 am
Paul George qualified for the Designated Player rule while on rookie contract and became eligible for the 5th year 30% max. The actual contract he signed with the Pacers was something like 27% of the max.
Recently, there is talk that the Pacers and PG are discussing a renegotiate and extend deal similar to those signed by Westbrook and Harden. According to Eric Pincus, PG's contract becomes eligible for restructuring on 25 Sept (3rd year anniversary of his rookie extension). Unlike Westbrook or Harden though, PG has only 6 years of experience, so by the usual rule he should be eligible only for the 25% max instead of the 30% max that Harden and Westbrook signed for. Meaning that his salary this year can only go up to $22m instead of $26m for the other 2 guys. Is this correct or does Designated Player status (and higher player max) still apply here?
Recently, there is talk that the Pacers and PG are discussing a renegotiate and extend deal similar to those signed by Westbrook and Harden. According to Eric Pincus, PG's contract becomes eligible for restructuring on 25 Sept (3rd year anniversary of his rookie extension). Unlike Westbrook or Harden though, PG has only 6 years of experience, so by the usual rule he should be eligible only for the 25% max instead of the 30% max that Harden and Westbrook signed for. Meaning that his salary this year can only go up to $22m instead of $26m for the other 2 guys. Is this correct or does Designated Player status (and higher player max) still apply here?