I understand people are upset, but why are the mods just allowing all the attacks on Oklahoma?
Just wondering why there seems to be an exception in this case.
What's with allowing personal attacks on OKC?
What's with allowing personal attacks on OKC?
-
AirP.
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,054
- And1: 32,147
- Joined: Nov 21, 2007
Re: What's with allowing personal attacks on OKC?
-
DelaneyRudd
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 104,523
- And1: 9,462
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
-
Re: What's with allowing personal attacks on OKC?
Personal attacks on cities people know nothing about is nothing new.
Re: What's with allowing personal attacks on OKC?
-
MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 101,784
- And1: 54,927
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: What's with allowing personal attacks on OKC?
On one thread someone said they should be named the Oklahoma City Bombers. Crap like that will get you a one way ticket out of here quickly.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: What's with allowing personal attacks on OKC?
-
Mr. E
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,291
- And1: 6,510
- Joined: Apr 15, 2006
- Location: Defending Planet Earth with a Jet-Pack & a Ray-Gun!
-
Re: What's with allowing personal attacks on OKC?
MickeyDavis wrote:On one thread someone said they should be named the Oklahoma City Bombers. Crap like that will get you a one way ticket out of here quickly.
I'm glad to hear that. I was pretty appalled to read comments like that, and it takes a lot to offend me.
Feelings are going to be raw on this one for a while. Thanks to the mods for keeping an eye out for things like this.
"A fanatic is one who can't change their mind and won't change the subject."
- Winston Churchill
- Winston Churchill
Return to Feedback and Suggestions