ratul wrote:
Again, it should be users choice to determine what is or is not interesting - not mods - mods are there to regulate abusive language, trolling etc - not determine what quality discussion is or is not.
That is incorrect.
ratul wrote:
Again, it should be users choice to determine what is or is not interesting - not mods - mods are there to regulate abusive language, trolling etc - not determine what quality discussion is or is not.
disoblige wrote:Is there anything in value in this thread that the other thread didnt have?
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=1049607
I'm sorry, but there was interesting discussion, i certainly had not seen the video (not all of us spend our days on this forum) and frankly, 2 pages of discussion plus 2400 views is valid enough.
0:43 - 0:48 Is what Ozzy would sound like if someone were to be able to unlock all his locked threads.
Late night RealGm = where threads stay unlocked.
I've enjoyed this thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Phil XI wrote:ratul wrote:
Honestly - the discretion actually is not in the rules - nowhere does it say in the rules that Mods have the discretion to 'lock a thread' - it just says they have the right to edit or delete. Locking should only be used for abusive, and derogatory language - your 'locking' priveleges are being abused, and all the mods are silly backtracking trying to make excuses.
I'm sorry, but there was interesting discussion, i certainly had not seen the video (not all of us spend our days on this forum) and frankly, 2 pages of discussion plus 2400 views is valid enough.
Discussion can be sparked by anything - and should be welcomed - rather than create a depressing pit of fear that discourages discussion - that's what this forum is about, not mods making up random rules and abusing their privelege.
Well that sounds like you have a foundation for your own website.
At this site, Mods have discretion to lock sites and will continue to do so.
This site is a privilege not a right. If you don't like the way it's run, it's your right to post elsewhere. It's our right to lock threads we feel are not good. Yours in this case, was not.
Sorry.
Klomp wrote:I don't know the history here, of whether Ozzy is a good or bad mod. But looking at the thread in question, he made the correct decision.I'm sorry, but there was interesting discussion, i certainly had not seen the video (not all of us spend our days on this forum) and frankly, 2 pages of discussion plus 2400 views is valid enough.
What exactly in the following posts qualifies as "interesting discussion":0:43 - 0:48 Is what Ozzy would sound like if someone were to be able to unlock all his locked threads.Late night RealGm = where threads stay unlocked.I've enjoyed this thread
Additionally, 5 of the remaining 13 posts in the thread were just YouTube links. Thats not discussing.
The RealGM Moderating Team has a desire to make this a place where quality basketball discussions happen. There are many other forums where a thread like that may be deemed "quality" or interesting," but not at RealGM. We have a higher standard here.
ratul wrote:
What are you talking about? Being a mod is a privelege, not a right - just because I don't waste my days posting like a madman so as to qualify as a mod on a basketball forum, it doesn't mean this site is less 'mine' than it is 'yours'
If I don't like the way things, I have the right to complain, and complain vigorously - if you don't like it, then no one cares - do you see the flaws in your attempt to wield power, especially given the title of this subforum?
Phil XI wrote:ratul wrote:
What are you talking about? Being a mod is a privelege, not a right - just because I don't waste my days posting like a madman so as to qualify as a mod on a basketball forum, it doesn't mean this site is less 'mine' than it is 'yours'
Being a mod is a selective position the admins choose to help them run their site. No, posting like a mad man is not the qualifications... to get this thankless job. But one I agreed to help out and work for the sites best interests.
Meaning: My responses to you are speaking for the Admins in various Feedback and Suggestion threads, like this one.If I don't like the way things, I have the right to complain, and complain vigorously - if you don't like it, then no one cares - do you see the flaws in your attempt to wield power, especially given the title of this subforum?
You can complain until your are blue in the face. However, we have the right to reply to your complaint and feel little Ozzy acted appropriately in your thread being locked. it was his discretion and Me, HowardMass and Winterpeg and every mod who posts in this thread all agree that Ozzy's actions are just in this case,.
I have been asked by the site admins to wield my power as I see fit.
So what do you want to come from this? You wrote up a feedback and we replied that Ozzy used discretion and was in the right. What do we go from here?
DelaneyRudd wrote:http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewforum.php?f=72
Here's the difference. No other team has this.
Blame Rasho wrote:DelaneyRudd wrote:http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewforum.php?f=72
Here's the difference. No other team has this.
It isn't the only difference....
itbobby007 wrote:You should start your own board. That way you can make the rules.
Return to Feedback and Suggestions