3 days ago, I came onto the forum and found out I was banned. Fair enough. Today, the ban was lifted. I found two messages in my inbox by the moderator that banned me (alucryts). Here's the image:
Now firstly, the first message (board warning issue) it had the link to the post I was warned about in it. As I said, it was a fair enough warning and something I would have took on board as to changing my posting behaviour. The second message had nothing other than me being banned. No link to why I was banned, nothing.
Now living in Australia, obviously the time these messages were sent to me I was asleep. However, the question I am raising is based on how I am supposed to take a warning and work on my posting methods when the individual moderator decides to warn me first, then ban me an hour later. Isnt that a little contradicting? Yes, I can take that warning now, sure. But what is the point of warning someone first, only to ban them an hour later (with only an explanation of me "baiting" given without a link or description) ??? Do moderators have an agenda on this board? It's a question, not a statement. Am I to watch what I say about others teams in the future just in case a mod gets offended over the post? Is that how RealGM works?
Someone feel free to explain.
— Mags
