Implicity leading to bans?

[nbafan341]

Hello,
I come in peace as Im mearly trying to speak positively and offer my perspecive on a growing issue.

Does RealGm Issue bans to posts that are not explicitly breaking rules but had been misinterpreted implications?

I had an experience where I made a post abiding to the rules but a post of mine was misinterpreted and the volume number of individuals concerned led the moderator into issuing me a ban for "completely inappropriate". Within the thread where my post was made, another person sought to clarify what I meant and I was able to explain myself, but was still issued a ban. I followed up with the moderator after the incident and they never got back to me. Prior to this ban, I was coming off another ban where I reflected and read the rules instead of following up with that mod. Considering the timig and how I genuinely tried to be a positive poster on the community, it left a bad taste in my mouth. I notice inconsistency and bis with some moderators and it inspired me to voice my concern here. I knoq this post wont be perceived well, but I Qould appreciate the opportunity to have my concerns addressed as I had made multiple attempts to do so via private messaging with mods and it hasnt worked out well.

Tl;dr is it fair to ban posts that abide to rules but had implications that concerned other posters?

[Slava]

This is one of the posts you got warned for.

Cousins needs to man up, he looks like half the baboons out in America right now.

I don't think you have a right to complain to anyone about it.

[Howard Mass]

Thank you for answering this Slava.