Poster rating system
Posted: Wed Jun 9, 2010 2:56 am
Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=1018025
HMFFL wrote:The poster rating system is a fail to me, but a rating system for articles can be useful.
darealslimshady wrote:Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.
Dry_Fish wrote:I keep my own rating system.
darealslimshady -23
LittleOzzy + 2
DelaneyRudd -4
wetsthebed +16
EndOfArgument +10
HMFFL +12
True Warrior Zo -1
Yuri Vaultin wrote:darealslimshady wrote:Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.
This would be bad.
Posters could write insightful and articulate posts rife with quality only to get voted badly because the wteens on this site didn't agree with it. Of course, some douchebag writes "+1. IBTL" and he'll get high praise from the same group of people.
Quality, sadly is subjective and people will base quality on whether or not the post coincides with their beliefs and opinions.
darealslimshady wrote:Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.
darealslimshady wrote:Yuri Vaultin wrote:darealslimshady wrote:Does anybody else think that this website should have some sort of rating system where users rate other users based on post quality. I think that would be pretty cool.
This would be bad.
Posters could write insightful and articulate posts rife with quality only to get voted badly because the wteens on this site didn't agree with it. Of course, some douchebag writes "+1. IBTL" and he'll get high praise from the same group of people.
Quality, sadly is subjective and people will base quality on whether or not the post coincides with their beliefs and opinions.
I do not agree. Maybe other people may behave like this, but I know that I can respect other peoples opinion that are well thought out, and I don't think I am the only one who thinks like this.
Dry_Fish wrote:I keep my own rating system.
darealslimshady -23
LittleOzzy + 2
DelaneyRudd -4
wetsthebed +16
EndOfArgument +10
HMFFL +12
True Warrior Zo -1
Phil X wrote:darealslimshady wrote:Yuri Vaultin wrote:This would be bad.
Posters could write insightful and articulate posts rife with quality only to get voted badly because the wteens on this site didn't agree with it. Of course, some douchebag writes "+1. IBTL" and he'll get high praise from the same group of people.
Quality, sadly is subjective and people will base quality on whether or not the post coincides with their beliefs and opinions.
I do not agree. Maybe other people may behave like this, but I know that I can respect other peoples opinion that are well thought out, and I don't think I am the only one who thinks like this.
maybe you should post here longer than 3 days to gauge posters from this site
wetsthebed wrote:Dry_Fish wrote:I keep my own rating system.
darealslimshady -23
LittleOzzy + 2
DelaneyRudd -4
wetsthebed +16
EndOfArgument +10
HMFFL +12
True Warrior Zo -1
Dry_Fish +100
darealslimshady wrote:darealslimshady +23
Little Ozzy -2
DelaneyRudd +4
wetsthebed -16
EndOfArgument -10
HMFFL -12
True Warrior Zo +1