GoBlue72391 wrote:haste10176 wrote:Pickled Prunes wrote:Markkanen is a Siakam level player, the difference being that Markkanen just got there and Siakam has proven it for a while. IND just got Siakam for three 1sts and matching salary, a wildly overpaid Bruce brown and scrubs.... and most people thought IND overpaid.
Meanwhile, Pod was an important part of the GSW rotation. 5th in MPG. 5th in PPG. 4th in AST. 2nd in REB. He isn't Jordan, but giving up a rotation player is tougher than giving up a pick. It's someone that is useful today, for the winning you talk about. It means you are upgrading your roster rather than adding to your roster, and those are two very different things.
Siakim cant shoot and Lauri 20mil salary this year will keep GSW out of the luxury tax which is good and gives them the oppurtunity to reset while still trying to contend. I think lauri is a little overrated right now but holding the deal up on pod is ridicolous by Mike gsw are done and thats ok too..
It's crazy to me that people think Lauri is overrated. 25 and 8 the past two years on 64 TS% getting all of the defensive attention and doing it primarily off-ball. If he played in a bigger market and was a little more flashy everyone would be talking about this guy. If anything he's underrated.
I don't think he is overrated. I think some people (for example: anyone that believes a team should offer the kitchen sink to get him) are overrating him. He's a good player, but he's not 27yo KD. There needs to be a cap to what you are willing to offer for him. GSW missed the playoffs without Lauri, and Lauri has never made the playoffs himself... so the end result would be a financially encumbered team with no picks, fewer young prospects, and if they are lucky, a 2nd round exit. It was wise to draw a line in the sand.
This is what people don't seem to be taking into account. Podz averaged 9/6/4 as a rookie. It took Lauri 6 years to come into his own and he is almost certainly better than Podz will ever be, but Podz will almost certainly improve more over the next 4 years than Lauri will. Lauri was also about to get a max and Podz is locked in the next three years at about $4m per. Even if they kept Lauri at his $20m-ish number, Podz cost 80% less this season and >90% less the following two seasons.
Keeping that in mind, here are their Per36 numbers:
Podz 12/8/5 on 11 FGA's
Lauri 25/9/2 on 18 FGA's (Very doubtful he gets that many FGA's in GSW>)
So, exchanging Podz for Lauri nets you 13/1/-3 and cost you three picks, a swap or two, $100m+ over the next three years, whatever other depth you lose in matching salary... and you still aren't close to being a contender.
Mike D was wise to draw that line in the sand, even if some fans don't understand why.