Jimmy Butler, Suns Have 'Mutual Interest'; Warriors In 'We'll See' Mode

Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro

RealGM Wiretap
RealGM
Posts: 114,789
And1: 313
Joined: Mar 19, 2013

Jimmy Butler, Suns Have 'Mutual Interest'; Warriors In 'We'll See' Mode 

Post#1 » by RealGM Wiretap » Tue Dec 17, 2024 9:11 pm

The Phoenix Suns have a very narrow pathway to acquiring Jimmy Butler, but the two sides are believed to have mutual interest. The Suns would need to trade out Bradley Beal in order to acquire Butler as Devin Booker and Kevin Durant are considered untouchable. Beal has a no trade clause and would have to approve a trade. Beal is signed for two more seasons and has battled injuries and a drop in his productivity from the last time he was an All-Star in 2021.


The Golden State Warriors, for their part, want to evaluate how their existing pieces look before possibly circling back to a Butler trade. The other two teams on Butler's list, the Dallas Mavericks and Houston Rockets, are not believed to be interested. 


"The Suns and Jimmy Butler are believed to have a level of mutual interest," said Shams Charania on NBA Today on Tuesday. "The Warriors are in more of a situation of 'we'll see.' They have Jonathan Kuminga in the starting lineup right now. They're trying to figure out what this team looks like with Dennis Schroder. 


"Usually in this league when two sides, you know, we'll see."


Charania added that the one team that projects to have enough cap space to sign Butler in the offseason, the Brooklyn Nets, are not considered a likely destination should he become a free agent in 2025 and look to leave the Heat outright in a non-sign-and-trade scenario. 

Via Shams Charania/ESPN

User avatar
deeps6x
RealGM
Posts: 10,141
And1: 6,216
Joined: Nov 28, 2008
     

Re: Jimmy Butler, Suns Have 'Mutual Interest'; Warriors In 'We'll See' Mode 

Post#2 » by deeps6x » Tue Dec 17, 2024 9:59 pm

Nobody is taking Beal. The Heat are certainly not taking Beal. This whole article is pointless. Phoenix is stuck with him.
Spoiler:
BoyzNTheHood wrote:I apologize, I have incredibly small genitalia
User avatar
SkyBill40
General Manager
Posts: 7,771
And1: 6,548
Joined: Oct 24, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: Jimmy Butler, Suns Have 'Mutual Interest'; Warriors In 'We'll See' Mode 

Post#3 » by SkyBill40 » Tue Dec 17, 2024 10:44 pm

deeps6x wrote:Nobody is taking Beal. The Heat are certainly not taking Beal. This whole article is pointless. Phoenix is stuck with him.


As said in the article, "we'll see." MIA was one of Beal's preferred destinations and if he can be incentivized to go, I don't see why MIA wouldn't risk it and especially not seeing he only has two years remaining. That's a small price to pay to gain a big chunk of cap space in a short time.
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
User avatar
donemilio21
Analyst
Posts: 3,120
And1: 845
Joined: Aug 20, 2009
Location: Santa Barbara
   

Re: Jimmy Butler, Suns Have 'Mutual Interest'; Warriors In 'We'll See' Mode 

Post#4 » by donemilio21 » Tue Dec 17, 2024 10:52 pm

a drop in his productivity from the last time he was an All-Star in 2021.


He is playing with Durant and Booker, not with Hachimura and Bertans.
His usage rate and every stat is obviously would be down, but his TS% and his assist ration is actually higher than his 20-21 season.
Slim Charless
RealGM
Posts: 11,679
And1: 7,416
Joined: May 10, 2019
   

Re: Jimmy Butler, Suns Have 'Mutual Interest'; Warriors In 'We'll See' Mode 

Post#5 » by Slim Charless » Wed Dec 18, 2024 6:28 am

deeps6x wrote:Nobody is taking Beal. The Heat are certainly not taking Beal. This whole article is pointless. Phoenix is stuck with him.


Hopefully you're right. I have 0.00% interest in getting Jimmy B and paying him in the offseason.
dubbmotta
Senior
Posts: 745
And1: 129
Joined: Oct 19, 2017

Re: Jimmy Butler, Suns Have 'Mutual Interest'; Warriors In 'We'll See' Mode 

Post#6 » by dubbmotta » Wed Dec 18, 2024 7:00 pm

Fake news...Nobody wants injuried Beal and his punk azz contract..Beal and Herro in the same line up does not make sense.

Return to Wiretap Discussion