Post#40 » by moocow007 » Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:05 pm
This makes no sense for the Knicks...at all...AT ALL.
Unless Kupchak is going to help the Knicks find a taker for Stoudemire and Bargnani in return for no salary commitments for the summer of 2014, this type of nonsense deal would force the Knicks to pretty much have to resign Gasol after this season (when his current contract expires) AND blow any shot at signing someone like Love in the summer of 2015.
Why's that?
The Knicks will be over the cap for next season even if they move Chandler's contract (which expires conveniently after NEXT season). Without any real means beyond the mini-MLE to use to sign new players in the summer of 2014, they aren't going to be able to find anyone remotely in either Chandler or Gasol's class for that. So what this trade will end up doing is to put the Knicks essentially at the mercy of Gasol and his agent...that's assuming that Gasol doesn't bolt outright and leave the Knicks with some combination of Stoudemire/Bargnani to start at C next season.
Should I repeat that last sentence?
Unless Gasol somehow decides to do the Knicks a favor and sign for just one season more at big bucks...and why on earth would he do that (at age 34)?...the Knicks will not only have to give a multi-year deal to a 34 year old coming off 2 declining years BUT also say asta la vista to any chance of signing a REAL 2nd option in the summer of 2015. Gasol...at this point in his career...is NOT the difference maker that would rationally call for the Knicks to scrap the summer of 2015. Nor is he the difference maker in keeping Carmelo Anthony beyond this season (let's be honest here)...especially since he himself could be gone even before Anthony is.
And that's before even talking about the silliness of this trade from a fit issue for the Knicks. To which...the Knicks biggest issue is defense. They would be trading their 2 best defenders for a potential 58 game rental of a 33 year old coming off the worst year of his career last year and in the midst of another poo season? They have no real need for Gasol as an offensive option (Bargnani's having a more efficient season for a team who's offensive flow is even worse than the Lakers have been). His passing? The Knicks work best with small ball...that's apparent under Woodson. They really don't play a system that would maximize Gasol's passing ability. And Chandler rebounds as well as Gasol does but is a better defensive player.
From the Lakers standpoint? Chandler's salary would fit in line with Nash's in terms of when it expires and would set the Lakers up for the summer of 2015 when only Bryant is under contract (no one is taking Nash for an expiring contract this season). It would provide them with a center option for next season or a trade asset (especially if the Knicks also, for some silly reason, include Iman Shumpert). And tanking? With Kobe Bryant on the team, nobodies tanking intentionally.
IF Gasol's contract had 2 years left instead of 1 this may have made more sense for the Knicks. But the expiring contract and, more importantly, the extending part of it, is the same reason why the Lowry trade (Lowry is also expiring) wouldn't make sense. Neither are difference makers enough for the Knicks to scrap the 2015 plan (if they return and resign) and both are risks to bolt and leave the Knicks with nothing for next season and no way to replace it (Knicks aren't tanking next season).