luss54321 wrote:puja21 wrote:luss54321 wrote:
CP3 takes more shots and shoots a higher percent in the playoffs vs reg season
career reg season
.472 FG%, ,505 2P% .372 3P%, .868 FT%, 13.9 FGA, 3.4 3PA, 5 FTA, 4.5 TRB, 9.8 AST, 2.3 STL, 2.4 TOV, 18.7 PTS
career playoffs
.484 FG%, .519 2P%, .381 3P%, .847 FT%, 16.1 FGA, 4 3PA, 5.1 FTA, 4.7 TRB, 9.4 AST, 2.2 STL, 2.7 TOV, 21.4 PTS
It's really not about shooting percentage, it's about the ability to take over a game, and carry your team to victory. It's a skill that Chris Paul undeniably lacks. He's a hall of famer who played with two other all-stars in LA, yet he still never got past the 2nd round. Smaller players generally have a more difficult time getting baskets down the stretch of a tight game.... Steve Nash, Chris Paul, Allen Iverson, Kyle Lowry... The list goes on. Steph is the exception. I'm just saying it's hard to win a championship when your best player is a small PG, there's not a lot of precedent for those teams succeeding in the playoffs.
Meh "not about shooting percentage" and saying someone lacks this "indefinable quality" sounds pretty silly and is quickly put down.
KG went out in the first round 7x in a row to open his career, 4x on teams that won 50+ games.
TMac went out in the first round 8x in a row.
"Mister Clutch" Jerry West choked in game 7 several times against Boston
Even MJ failed to get past the first round 3x and then spent the next 3 years losing to the Pistons
All those guys could and did takeover games offensively plenty of times in the playoffs.
Steph isn't "the exception"; that's just cherry picking for your case. Isiah Thomas did it. Tiny Archibald. Dennis Johnson. Mo Cheeks etc... Besides, it's a team game, Russell had Cousy & Co. Chamberlain didn't. Later Russell had the Jones boys, Havlicek etc.. -- Elgin and West didn't.
Did the Clippers choke in the back half of several playoff series? Sure.
Still, Paul has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to take over a game with scoring during the playoffs.
Here is one of dozens of examples, this from April 2013:
^Getting around prime age Tony Allen's perimeter defense and finishing over Arthur for the win in a game where he shot 53% and 9/1 ast/tov. Meanwhile, DeAndre Jordan averaged 3.7 pts and 6.3 rebs in the series despite starting every game while ZBo/Gasol combined for almost 40 pts/game.
Paul is not physically what he was in his MVP-candidate prime, but it's silly to say his team's failings in the playoffs are somehow tied to his height limiting his offensive production; his output on that end has been 1st ballot HOF every year in the playoffs. Even in that series, where they went up 2-0 only drop 4 straight, Paul had the best advanced stats and highest eFG% of anyone in the series, including bigs.
It's virtually the same story in every series; fell in 7 games to Popovich/Duncan/Parker/Manu and was the best offensive player in the series in 2008.
IN 2011 versus Kobe/Pau/Bynum/Odom/Artest played almost 42 mpg and was easily the best offensive player in the series again:
CP: 22.0 pts / 6.7 reb / 11.5 ast / 1.8 stl / .545 fg / .474 3P / .796 FT
KB: 22.5 pts / 3.7 reb / 3.8 ast / 1.5 stl / .437 fg / .368 3P / .826 FT
If Houston fails it's going to be due to a Paul injury or his short-comings defensively -- e.g. in that same Memphis game, Conley scored 28 to Paul's 24, and did it shooting .500. He's never been a 1 on 1 stopper, always a steals guy playing the passing lanes and quick picking in the front court.
The narrative of his offense failing him is just silly and the only way to even present the argument is to ignore all the data and all comparison against his peers who "did" manage to win.