Chris3323 wrote:CP3 to the Bucks makes too much sense
cp3 at $40 mil a year is obviously preferable to bledsoe at $17 mil a year? you're severely underrating one of the better two-way point guards in the league
Moderators: Domejandro, bwgood77
Chris3323 wrote:CP3 to the Bucks makes too much sense
No way Chris gives up too much money, maybe 2.5 million a year, so 7.5 million or 10 million max to round it up. He won't waive his last season of all that money even though that's what OKC or potential trade partners (Miami) want.moocow007 wrote:dougthonus wrote:tigerae wrote:They already got assets in forms of picks for taking his contract and were able to get Westbrook's supermax off the books, too. Just keeping him to potentially become a bad influence in the locker room if they do end up benching him down the line makes no sense.
Buyout is an option depending how much money Paul is willing to give up. I think it would need to be significant though for a buyout to go through.
How much do you want in a buyout Chris?
Houston was already a contender with CP3 and the jury is still out on how well Russ and Harden can co-exist. Plus, I am still adament that the Rockets issues are with DAntoni first and foremost and I have a feeling he will get fired soon after the season starts. Russ isn't a good 3pt shooter (at least CP3 is decent) and I just don't see him really working out well in that system.LAKESHOW wrote:This GM is an idiot. Sends houston the goods, making them a contender. Sends clippers the goods making them a contender. Takes back the worst contract. Didnt even get lou williams as a bonus for paul george. Then reveals to woj how much of a dope he is, believing someone is going to take that contract. Lol
tigerae wrote:Houston was already a contender with CP3 and the jury is still out on how well Russ and Harden can co-exist. Plus, I am still adament that the Rockets issues are with DAntoni first and foremost and I have a feeling he will get fired soon after the season starts. Russ isn't a good 3pt shooter (at least CP3 is decent) and I just don't see him really working out well in that system.LAKESHOW wrote:This GM is an idiot. Sends houston the goods, making them a contender. Sends clippers the goods making them a contender. Takes back the worst contract. Didnt even get lou williams as a bonus for paul george. Then reveals to woj how much of a dope he is, believing someone is going to take that contract. Lol
The GM thinking that they could flip CP3 for even more assets after they got an unprotected pick is just crazy. You think the Rockets didn't make calls to try and trade CP3 for a more favorable package that would have worked better in their system first?!?
If I was them, I would have made it known Russ was available and saw what packages were out there prior to trading him to Houston. They may have been able to get a deal similar to what the Clippers got for Blake's supermax contract from a small market team that had no chances at an elite player otherwise.
As for the PG13 trade, the Clippers definitely overpaid for him with all of the first round picks and very promising young talent in Shai. The Thunder won on that trade for sure, but for the Clippers it made sense because in essence they were trading for PG13 and Khawi.
LAKESHOW wrote:This GM is an idiot. Sends houston the goods, making them a contender. Sends clippers the goods making them a contender. Takes back the worst contract. Didnt even get lou williams as a bonus for paul george. Then reveals to woj how much of a dope he is, believing someone is going to take that contract. Lol
dougthonus wrote:Chris3323 wrote:CP3 to the Bucks makes too much sense
The Bucks can't afford Brogdon, but they can afford CP3?
Vegeta10176 wrote:dougthonus wrote:Chris3323 wrote:CP3 to the Bucks makes too much sense
The Bucks can't afford Brogdon, but they can afford CP3?
Letting go of Brodgon was dumb I'd say but CP3 for Bledsloe and what ever other contracts they can throw in makes perfect sense and would get them out of the East at least..
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.
by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53
im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.
12footrim wrote:As many draft picks as they have moving forward in the future I don't know why they really want to trade him. They don't need to tank, and teams like Toronto and the Bucks didnt' get to where they are by tankings really. There is no one way, you can obviously draft guys like Giannis and Kawhi outside the lottery as well or use your stack of draft picks to get a star.
As it is now they have a competitive team with Paul, Galo, and Adams that can probably even compete for the 8th seed and they have a good young asset in Gilgeruous Alexander to try to grow. Tanking in this new loto reform probably gets you no where anyway. The sweeter spot is like 6-10 or whatever if you don't make the playoffs which is exactly probably around what they project.
I_Like_Dirt wrote:The whole comparison to Kevin McHale is ridiculously close, imo... And that's without more hilarious aspects of the comparison, e.g. if Wally Sczerbiak were 7 feet tall with the slower reflexes that came with the additional height, he'd be Bargnani.