The_Hater wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:we not even running that much triangle. i mean, sometimes they break it out in the half-court. but i'm seeing a lot of UCLA flex and pindowns. they do multiple screens. they mix it up a lot.
i find it hard to believe that practicing against triangle sets is the reason these grown professionals are struggling to defend the same screen and roll plays they have been seeing all their lives. quite frankly, the two wins are the two games the knicks brought the most effort on the defensive end. that's going to be it. the knicks aren't having problems scoring most nights. 114-109 means you didn't defend well.
It makes complete sense that if you're not practicing defending against the pick and roll that you will struggle to defend it come game day. Especially since that's the staple of almost every other offense in the league. That seems like common sense to me. Only those in the organization can tell us exactly how much practice time is used featuring the triangle on offense and defending it.
i agree with everything you say here. i am just perplexed at the notion the knicks aren't defending p/r in practice because... well... they are doing it on offense too. so, you would think they practice it, and hence, defend against it in practice.
as a knick fan, it doesn't add up to hear some of this stuff. it feels like people are looking for scapegoats, or "escapegoats" as a former knick once said. grown men who defend p/r in every game from pickup to AAU to college to pro all of a sudden feel like the principles of p/r defense is not being practiced enough? i see a lack of effort on the defensive end, and i can't help but think that's not the biggest factor.
but if jeff hornacek needs to devote more time to p/r defense in practice, then he should. if the players feel like it's missing, then they should probably get a taste. if i were coach, i'd let them defend p/r... then call them out if they still don't defend with effort.