Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe

Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro

RealGM Wiretap
RealGM
Posts: 102,565
And1: 293
Joined: Mar 19, 2013

Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#1 » by RealGM Wiretap » Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:24 pm

The Milwaukee Bucks continue to be interested in trading away Greg Monroe. Monroe is on a $17.14 million salary and has an opt-out clause for 17-18 with his salary of $17.88 million if he opts in.


Monroe was signed by the Bucks during the 2015 offseason but he has struggled to fit in beside Giannis Antetokounmpo and Jabari Parker.


The Bucks also have John Henson and Miles Plumlee at center signed long-term.

Via Gery Woelfel/Woelfel's Press Box

Bentley1225
RealGM
Posts: 13,332
And1: 1,562
Joined: Jan 10, 2007

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#2 » by Bentley1225 » Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:30 pm

The issue is the Bucks haven't been featuring him and he's more and more likely to opt in next year. As a result I think there is 0 market for him unless Bucks give up another asset.

I still think Monroe/2nd round pick for Evans/Ajinca makes most sense.
Bbdub34
Ballboy
Posts: 4
And1: 4
Joined: Mar 21, 2016

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#3 » by Bbdub34 » Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:34 pm

Monroe to Phoenix
Knight to Sixers
Noel to Boston
Amir Johnson and first Rd pick via Boston to Bucks.
User avatar
GoldenAntlers
General Manager
Posts: 9,325
And1: 4,403
Joined: Feb 13, 2013
 

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#4 » by GoldenAntlers » Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:39 pm

Bentley1225 wrote:The issue is the Bucks haven't been featuring him and he's more and more likely to opt in next year. As a result I think there is 0 market for him unless Bucks give up another asset.

I still think Monroe/2nd round pick for Evans/Ajinca makes most sense.


Although that may be true, when he is on the floor, Monroe is playing very well and hustles on defense more this season than ever before.
"Silence is a source of great strength." - Lao Tzu
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 3,831
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#5 » by spree2kawhi » Mon Dec 26, 2016 5:34 pm

I wonder how he'd look next to Porzingis
Carmelo
Junior
Posts: 334
And1: 89
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
   

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#6 » by Carmelo » Mon Dec 26, 2016 5:45 pm

Bbdub34 wrote:Monroe to Phoenix
Knight to Sixers
Noel to Boston
Amir Johnson and first Rd pick via Boston to Bucks.


That trade sucks. Sixers give up the best piece and get worst return.
User avatar
Jellybeans
Starter
Posts: 2,058
And1: 2,346
Joined: Feb 13, 2016
     

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#7 » by Jellybeans » Mon Dec 26, 2016 5:47 pm

basketboule wrote:I wonder how he'd look next to Porzingis

IF our defene now is just awful,then with Monroe it would be just 10 times worse.AND no1 will take Noah contract without draft picks or more assets
IAMZOOTED
Pro Prospect
Posts: 980
And1: 99
Joined: Jul 26, 2016

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#8 » by IAMZOOTED » Mon Dec 26, 2016 6:02 pm

basketboule wrote:I wonder how he'd look next to Porzingis


Terrible
dan-man wrote:These guys are EASILY the second best team in the NBA. Time to figure out how to keep all these awful Eastern Conference teams out of the playoffs.


^ After the Timberwolves signed Jamal Crawford.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 24,554
And1: 5,473
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: Into the Great White Nothing
     

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#9 » by Bernman » Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:10 pm

Bentley1225 wrote:The issue is the Bucks haven't been featuring him and he's more and more likely to opt in next year. As a result I think there is 0 market for him unless Bucks give up another asset.

I still think Monroe/2nd round pick for Evans/Ajinca makes most sense.


There's a lot of group think, confirmation bias, and ignorance on Monroe. He's having a very good season off the bench for the Bucks. His Roland Rating (PER differential and +/- weighted and combined) is like top 20 or 30 in the NBA at nearly +10. Those #'s are only updated through the 17th, but I think it's actually went up since then. Their last charted number had the Bucks at +7.8 per 48 with Monroe on the floor vs. -1.8 off the floor. It's a parroted myth that he's somehow entrenched as a losing player. So you actually have to give up an asset to acquire Monroe (and if he opts in that may even be looked at as a positive). If not, the Bucks will just stand pat, and possibly can have him as a trump card against small ball teams in the playoffs or in general as the 6th man. This report came from Gery Woelfel anyways. He's not one of the more credible reporters on the NBA.
"TRADE GIANNIS" - Magic Giannison
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#10 » by SMTBSI » Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:57 pm

Bernman wrote:So you actually have to give up an asset to acquire Monroe (and if he opts in that may even be looked at as a positive). If not, the Bucks will just stand pat, and possibly can have him as a trump card against small ball teams in the playoffs or in general as the 6th man. This report came from Gery Woelfel anyways. He's not one of the more credible reporters on the NBA.

You may be right. If that's the case, then it just boils down to MIL keeping Monroe, and we can all move on.
User avatar
Triple 7
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,528
And1: 983
Joined: Jan 24, 2015
Location: Henderson, NV

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#11 » by Triple 7 » Mon Dec 26, 2016 8:12 pm

Bbdub34 wrote:Monroe to Phoenix
Knight to Sixers
Noel to Boston
Amir Johnson and first Rd pick via Boston to Bucks.


You missed the part of this story where the Bucks have a roster full of big men.
"Is he not unique? No one plays like this guy. This guy is the new guy. This is the new form."
- George Karl on Giannis
User avatar
Triple 7
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,528
And1: 983
Joined: Jan 24, 2015
Location: Henderson, NV

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#12 » by Triple 7 » Mon Dec 26, 2016 8:16 pm

IAMZOOTED wrote:
basketboule wrote:I wonder how he'd look next to Porzingis


Terrible


Greg Monroe is currently 7th in the NBA among centers in Box Plus/Minus (BPM) at 4.1. Monroe's 4.1 would rank #1 overall on the Knicks. http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/NYK/2017.html#all_advanced
"Is he not unique? No one plays like this guy. This guy is the new guy. This is the new form."
- George Karl on Giannis
kenwood3333
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,112
And1: 3,196
Joined: Dec 10, 2013

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#13 » by kenwood3333 » Mon Dec 26, 2016 9:41 pm

how does he compare to mozgov?
IAMZOOTED
Pro Prospect
Posts: 980
And1: 99
Joined: Jul 26, 2016

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#14 » by IAMZOOTED » Mon Dec 26, 2016 9:52 pm

Triple 7 wrote:
IAMZOOTED wrote:
basketboule wrote:I wonder how he'd look next to Porzingis


Terrible


Greg Monroe is currently 7th in the NBA among centers in Box Plus/Minus (BPM) at 4.1. Monroe's 4.1 would rank #1 overall on the Knicks. http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/NYK/2017.html#all_advanced


Cool. That doesn't mean he'd be a good fit
dan-man wrote:These guys are EASILY the second best team in the NBA. Time to figure out how to keep all these awful Eastern Conference teams out of the playoffs.


^ After the Timberwolves signed Jamal Crawford.
User avatar
Fresh360Waves
Veteran
Posts: 2,648
And1: 339
Joined: Aug 01, 2013
Location: City of Angels
     

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#15 » by Fresh360Waves » Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:06 pm

Triple 7 wrote:
Bbdub34 wrote:Monroe to Phoenix
Knight to Sixers
Noel to Boston
Amir Johnson and first Rd pick via Boston to Bucks.


You missed the part of this story where the Bucks have a roster full of big men.


Amir is an expiring contract tho. If anything Milwaukee can either cut Amir and save some money or trade him again to a contender for a pick.
User avatar
Fresh360Waves
Veteran
Posts: 2,648
And1: 339
Joined: Aug 01, 2013
Location: City of Angels
     

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#16 » by Fresh360Waves » Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:16 pm

Bbdub34 wrote:Monroe to Phoenix
Knight to Sixers
Noel to Boston
Amir Johnson and first Rd pick via Boston to Bucks.


Not a bad trade to me. Only thing is, Phoenix would have way too many big men. Chandler, Chriss, Bender, Len, etc all need minutes. Monroe can't play the 4.
User avatar
Fresh360Waves
Veteran
Posts: 2,648
And1: 339
Joined: Aug 01, 2013
Location: City of Angels
     

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#17 » by Fresh360Waves » Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:18 pm

kenwood3333 wrote:how does he compare to mozgov?


Definitely much better on offense than Mozgov.
NatiboyB
Rookie
Posts: 1,073
And1: 389
Joined: Jun 15, 2013

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#18 » by NatiboyB » Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:31 pm

I'm convinced Monroe may as well just go ahead and opt-in to his option for next season.
eathb_au
Analyst
Posts: 3,377
And1: 1,116
Joined: May 30, 2010

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#19 » by eathb_au » Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:53 pm

Denver has cap space to absorb Monroe's salary.

So Monroe + Milwaukee 1st for a TE.
User avatar
Triple 7
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,528
And1: 983
Joined: Jan 24, 2015
Location: Henderson, NV

Re: Bucks Remain Interested In Trading Greg Monroe 

Post#20 » by Triple 7 » Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:54 pm

IAMZOOTED wrote:
Triple 7 wrote:
IAMZOOTED wrote:
Terrible


Greg Monroe is currently 7th in the NBA among centers in Box Plus/Minus (BPM) at 4.1. Monroe's 4.1 would rank #1 overall on the Knicks. http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/NYK/2017.html#all_advanced


Cool. That doesn't mean he'd be a good fit


Ok, tell me why he would be a bad fit. The onus is on you.
"Is he not unique? No one plays like this guy. This guy is the new guy. This is the new form."
- George Karl on Giannis

Return to Wiretap Discussion