Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade

Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro

RealGM Wiretap
RealGM
Posts: 123,027
And1: 320
Joined: Mar 19, 2013

Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#1 » by RealGM Wiretap » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:45 pm

The Minnesota Timberwolves are actively shopping Ricky Rubio.


The Timberwolves have attached Rubio to multiple offers with Shabazz Muhammad to several teams around the NBA.


The Sacramento Kings have had a strong interest in acquiring Rubio, but there’s no traction on a deal between those two teams. 


Minnesota has been searching for a "bridge" guard in return to start in the short-term but ultimately back up Kris Dunn.


Rubio, 26, is the highest paid player on the young Timberwolves roster this season. He is making $13.5 million for 2016-17 and will be owed $29 million through the end of his contract in 2019.

Via Adrian Wojnarowski/The Vertical

User avatar
Euphonetiks
Pro Prospect
Posts: 958
And1: 468
Joined: Dec 16, 2015
   

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#2 » by Euphonetiks » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:01 pm

I hope the Pels can figure out a way to move Jrue and/or Tyreke and end up with Rubio.
IAMZOOTED
Pro Prospect
Posts: 980
And1: 99
Joined: Jul 26, 2016

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#3 » by IAMZOOTED » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:06 pm

Euphonetiks wrote:I hope the Pels can figure out a way to move Jrue and/or Tyreke and end up with Rubio.


You'd rather have Rubio than Jrue?
dan-man wrote:These guys are EASILY the second best team in the NBA. Time to figure out how to keep all these awful Eastern Conference teams out of the playoffs.


^ After the Timberwolves signed Jamal Crawford.
User avatar
Euphonetiks
Pro Prospect
Posts: 958
And1: 468
Joined: Dec 16, 2015
   

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#4 » by Euphonetiks » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:10 pm

IAMZOOTED wrote:
Euphonetiks wrote:I hope the Pels can figure out a way to move Jrue and/or Tyreke and end up with Rubio.


You'd rather have Rubio than Jrue?


I would rather have more cap space with guaranteed years. I really like Jrue, but he is going to want big $$$ to stay in New Orleans and is too passive to be the Robin to AD. I think Rubio would give us jrue's defense and run the offense better even with his worse shooting/spacing.

I think Jrue fits best with us as a 6th man playing 25 minutes off the bench and finishing (his role last year), but he is highly unlikely to sign a deal in fitting with that role.
kenwood3333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,832
And1: 3,736
Joined: Dec 10, 2013

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#5 » by kenwood3333 » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:15 pm

Don't quite understand the intention from the Wolves side. Dunn is not ready to start. Rubio is the glue of their offense. Without Rubio the wolves will lose more games. The wolves have enough young talent to develop. They need to instill a winning culture.
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,766
And1: 9,642
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#6 » by Marty McFly » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:20 pm

kenwood3333 wrote:Don't quite understand the intention from the Wolves side. Dunn is not ready to start. Rubio is the glue of their offense. Without Rubio the wolves will lose more games. The wolves have enough young talent to develop. They need to instill a winning culture.


tanking purposes obviously.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
Cipoteman
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 227
Joined: Jan 15, 2012

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#7 » by Cipoteman » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:37 pm

Not a big fan of Rubio but IMO the Wolves should consider moving Lavine right now

I wonder if they could somehow make a pack around him to get McCollum from Portland
Sam195
Analyst
Posts: 3,306
And1: 310
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#8 » by Sam195 » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:40 pm

Marty McFly wrote:
kenwood3333 wrote:Don't quite understand the intention from the Wolves side. Dunn is not ready to start. Rubio is the glue of their offense. Without Rubio the wolves will lose more games. The wolves have enough young talent to develop. They need to instill a winning culture.


tanking purposes obviously.


Yeah dude answered his own question. Thibs has probably come to realize that even if wolves go on a roll and slide into the playoffs - they will just get it handed to them by the warriors or the spurs. There better off getting another high pick especially if reports are true that the 2017 draft has similar talent to the 2012 draft class. Wolves will be a superpower soon but they need more talent in their small market and lock down their anchors in Towns and Wiggins to extensions asap. I could see a 3 team trade scenario working out where rubio and some other assets land in philly while okafor/noel go to a third team and the wolves also pick up something of value.
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,829
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#9 » by LukasBMW » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:52 pm

Knight for Rubio and Shabazz
Image
MJallday59
Veteran
Posts: 2,696
And1: 116
Joined: Nov 16, 2007

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#10 » by MJallday59 » Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:52 pm

DJ Augustin would be perfect.
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#11 » by The_Hater » Wed Jan 18, 2017 12:13 am

MJallday59 wrote:DJ Augustin would be perfect.


Another poor defender who doesn't share the ball?
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
Mr Gametime
Junior
Posts: 408
And1: 117
Joined: Jul 05, 2015

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#12 » by Mr Gametime » Wed Jan 18, 2017 12:30 am

Rubio for Derick Rose works under the trade checker. The wolves get to try out Rose to see if he's the missing piece that they need and if not he's off the books at the end of the season. The Knicks get a younger PG that won't demand max money.
When the rich rob the poor it's called business, when the poor fight back it's called violence.
oceanlife
Junior
Posts: 413
And1: 727
Joined: Jun 12, 2012

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#13 » by oceanlife » Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:03 am

Sam195 wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:
kenwood3333 wrote:Don't quite understand the intention from the Wolves side. Dunn is not ready to start. Rubio is the glue of their offense. Without Rubio the wolves will lose more games. The wolves have enough young talent to develop. They need to instill a winning culture.


tanking purposes obviously.


Yeah dude answered his own question. Thibs has probably come to realize that even if wolves go on a roll and slide into the playoffs - they will just get it handed to them by the warriors or the spurs. There better off getting another high pick especially if reports are true that the 2017 draft has similar talent to the 2012 draft class. Wolves will be a superpower soon but they need more talent in their small market and lock down their anchors in Towns and Wiggins to extensions asap. I could see a 3 team trade scenario working out where rubio and some other assets land in philly while okafor/noel go to a third team and the wolves also pick up something of value.


I used to be 100% on board with the tank/rebuild strategy, but it seems like as more and more teams are willing to tank that the strategy is losing its effectiveness. The type of talents that come along in the draft who can change a franchise are rare as is, but increasingly the franchise changing talents are coming outside of the top 3 picks and becoming great because of coaching and development (Ex: Kawhi/Curry).

In fact if you break the numbers down, tanking is a really bad way to build statistically.

To illustrate this point let's take the top 3 picks from 2003-2012 Drafts and see how many of them brought their team to a championship level (which I define as their team at least once reaching the finals). Stick with me on this one. This is far enough back that it captures a good sample size of players without diluting it with players under 4 years of experience.

2003: LeBron/Darko/Carmelo (3 Trips)
2004: Dwight/Emeka/B.Gordon (1 Trip)
2005: Bogut/M.Williams/D.Williams (0 Trips)
2006: Bargnani/LaMarcus/Adam Porn Stache Morrison (0 Trips)
2007: Oden/Durant/Horford (1 Trip)
2008: Rose/Beasley/Mayo (0 Trips)
2009: B.Griffin/Thabeet/Harden (0 Trips)
2010: Wall/Evan Turner/Favors (0 Trips)
2011: Irving/Derrick Williams/Kanter (2 Trips)
2012: A.Davis/MKG/Beal (0 Trips)

In short, if you were a tanking team there were 30 possible top 3 picks over the course of 10 years. LeBron has of course dominated this list by bringing 3 finals trips to the Cavs. His teammate Irving was on board for 2 of them, whether you count that is up for debate. Then outside of those two only Durant and Dwight brought their teams to the championships season.

If you decided to tank as a team any season between '03 and '12 in order to get a top 3 pick then there was a 10-13% chance that you would get a player that would take you to the championship at least once. But remember, there's only a 64.3% chance that the worst team would get in the top 3. So you're looking at a 6.5-8.4% chance of a full on tank getting your team the super star player needed to get to the championship. That's assuming your team has the worst record, if your team wins a few games by accident that 6.5-8.4% chance falls under 3%.

In short, getting an NBA championship is hard and tanking is not always the best way to go. It might actually be better to develop the elusive "winning culture" and pray to the free agency gods.

Source for Odds: http://www.tankathon.com
streets talking
Senior
Posts: 540
And1: 31
Joined: Aug 13, 2015

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#14 » by streets talking » Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:22 am

The cleveland cavaliers should trade for rubio since they need a playmaker andnkyrie is more of a scorer than a point guard

JRsmith has been injured and useless all season
And kyle korver cant find rythim, cant score, cant be productive and is destroying the chemistry ... the cavs are 1-3 with korver and this is a cursed number

LeGM should trade JRsmith + Korver + 2018 1st rd pick for rubio
eddie jerel
Sophomore
Posts: 153
And1: 9
Joined: Oct 31, 2016
     

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#15 » by eddie jerel » Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:37 am

Mr Gametime wrote:Rubio for Derick Rose works under the trade checker. The wolves get to try out Rose to see if he's the missing piece that they need and if not he's off the books at the end of the season. The Knicks get a younger PG that won't demand max money.


Like your thinking,but how do salaries match? There's a $7M difference,for 1-1 Trade,and $3M if Shabazz is incl. Or am i looking at wrong Salaries for everyone? Just asking
User avatar
gold0259
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,544
And1: 65
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: minneapolis

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#16 » by gold0259 » Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:01 am

It's about goddam time! I like Brandon. Knights game.. maybe even Bledsoe with the bad knees greater than Rubio. Dragic is available... probably pass there. I am firm believer the wolves success begins the day Rubio exits the organization
User avatar
RCM88x
RealGM
Posts: 15,316
And1: 19,209
Joined: May 31, 2015
Location: Lebron Ball
     

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#17 » by RCM88x » Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:28 am

The man has been playing his best ball of the year the past six game and they have some impressive wins as well. I don't think he's truely the guy you want to move unless you believe Dunn can play starter minutes or you can get another starting PG in return that instantly makes the team better. I just don't know if that move exists right now.
Image

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,814
And1: 2,188
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#18 » by Note30 » Wed Jan 18, 2017 4:07 am

oceanlife wrote:
Sam195 wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:
tanking purposes obviously.


Yeah dude answered his own question. Thibs has probably come to realize that even if wolves go on a roll and slide into the playoffs - they will just get it handed to them by the warriors or the spurs. There better off getting another high pick especially if reports are true that the 2017 draft has similar talent to the 2012 draft class. Wolves will be a superpower soon but they need more talent in their small market and lock down their anchors in Towns and Wiggins to extensions asap. I could see a 3 team trade scenario working out where rubio and some other assets land in philly while okafor/noel go to a third team and the wolves also pick up something of value.


I used to be 100% on board with the tank/rebuild strategy, but it seems like as more and more teams are willing to tank that the strategy is losing its effectiveness. The type of talents that come along in the draft who can change a franchise are rare as is, but increasingly the franchise changing talents are coming outside of the top 3 picks and becoming great because of coaching and development (Ex: Kawhi/Curry).

In fact if you break the numbers down, tanking is a really bad way to build statistically.

To illustrate this point let's take the top 3 picks from 2003-2012 Drafts and see how many of them brought their team to a championship level (which I define as their team at least once reaching the finals). Stick with me on this one. This is far enough back that it captures a good sample size of players without diluting it with players under 4 years of experience.

2003: LeBron/Darko/Carmelo (3 Trips)
2004: Dwight/Emeka/B.Gordon (1 Trip)
2005: Bogut/M.Williams/D.Williams (0 Trips)
2006: Bargnani/LaMarcus/Adam Porn Stache Morrison (0 Trips)
2007: Oden/Durant/Horford (1 Trip)
2008: Rose/Beasley/Mayo (0 Trips)
2009: B.Griffin/Thabeet/Harden (0 Trips)
2010: Wall/Evan Turner/Favors (0 Trips)
2011: Irving/Derrick Williams/Kanter (2 Trips)
2012: A.Davis/MKG/Beal (0 Trips)

In short, if you were a tanking team there were 30 possible top 3 picks over the course of 10 years. LeBron has of course dominated this list by bringing 3 finals trips to the Cavs. His teammate Irving was on board for 2 of them, whether you count that is up for debate. Then outside of those two only Durant and Dwight brought their teams to the championships season.

If you decided to tank as a team any season between '03 and '12 in order to get a top 3 pick then there was a 10-13% chance that you would get a player that would take you to the championship at least once. But remember, there's only a 64.3% chance that the worst team would get in the top 3. So you're looking at a 6.5-8.4% chance of a full on tank getting your team the super star player needed to get to the championship. That's assuming your team has the worst record, if your team wins a few games by accident that 6.5-8.4% chance falls under 3%.

In short, getting an NBA championship is hard and tanking is not always the best way to go. It might actually be better to develop the elusive "winning culture" and pray to the free agency gods.

Source for Odds: http://www.tankathon.com
hyberx
Veteran
Posts: 2,502
And1: 417
Joined: Oct 31, 2001

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#19 » by hyberx » Wed Jan 18, 2017 4:30 am

Note30 wrote:
oceanlife wrote:
Sam195 wrote:
Yeah dude answered his own question. Thibs has probably come to realize that even if wolves go on a roll and slide into the playoffs - they will just get it handed to them by the warriors or the spurs. There better off getting another high pick especially if reports are true that the 2017 draft has similar talent to the 2012 draft class. Wolves will be a superpower soon but they need more talent in their small market and lock down their anchors in Towns and Wiggins to extensions asap. I could see a 3 team trade scenario working out where rubio and some other assets land in philly while okafor/noel go to a third team and the wolves also pick up something of value.


I used to be 100% on board with the tank/rebuild strategy, but it seems like as more and more teams are willing to tank that the strategy is losing its effectiveness. The type of talents that come along in the draft who can change a franchise are rare as is, but increasingly the franchise changing talents are coming outside of the top 3 picks and becoming great because of coaching and development (Ex: Kawhi/Curry).

In fact if you break the numbers down, tanking is a really bad way to build statistically.

To illustrate this point let's take the top 3 picks from 2003-2012 Drafts and see how many of them brought their team to a championship level (which I define as their team at least once reaching the finals). Stick with me on this one. This is far enough back that it captures a good sample size of players without diluting it with players under 4 years of experience.

2003: LeBron/Darko/Carmelo (3 Trips)
2004: Dwight/Emeka/B.Gordon (1 Trip)
2005: Bogut/M.Williams/D.Williams (0 Trips)
2006: Bargnani/LaMarcus/Adam Porn Stache Morrison (0 Trips)
2007: Oden/Durant/Horford (1 Trip)
2008: Rose/Beasley/Mayo (0 Trips)
2009: B.Griffin/Thabeet/Harden (0 Trips)
2010: Wall/Evan Turner/Favors (0 Trips)
2011: Irving/Derrick Williams/Kanter (2 Trips)
2012: A.Davis/MKG/Beal (0 Trips)

In short, if you were a tanking team there were 30 possible top 3 picks over the course of 10 years. LeBron has of course dominated this list by bringing 3 finals trips to the Cavs. His teammate Irving was on board for 2 of them, whether you count that is up for debate. Then outside of those two only Durant and Dwight brought their teams to the championships season.

If you decided to tank as a team any season between '03 and '12 in order to get a top 3 pick then there was a 10-13% chance that you would get a player that would take you to the championship at least once. But remember, there's only a 64.3% chance that the worst team would get in the top 3. So you're looking at a 6.5-8.4% chance of a full on tank getting your team the super star player needed to get to the championship. That's assuming your team has the worst record, if your team wins a few games by accident that 6.5-8.4% chance falls under 3%.

In short, getting an NBA championship is hard and tanking is not always the best way to go. It might actually be better to develop the elusive "winning culture" and pray to the free agency gods.

Source for Odds: http://www.tankathon.com



Good analysis. However, I bet most bad teams are not tanking for a championship, but tanking for a few good players just to be relevant rather than stuck in mediocre land forever (See the Knicks, even in the weak East). Worst case (other than drafting failure which can happen at any position) is that you get more chips to play with.
User avatar
ChokeFasncists
RealGM
Posts: 14,978
And1: 1,501
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
 

Re: Wolves Actively Looking For Ricky Rubio Trade 

Post#20 » by ChokeFasncists » Wed Jan 18, 2017 6:39 am

Rubio/Shabazz to Kings
WCS/Gay to Nets
Lopez/Bogs to (Bulls)
(Gibson/Rondo) to Wolves

Anyone?

Any team would want Lopez+Bogs and has something that the Wolves want?
MorbidHEAT wrote:My dislike for Lin started during Linsanity. It was absurd. It's probably irrational dislike at this point, but man he gets on my nerves. He's been tearing us up though.
Thanks for the honesty.

Return to Wiretap Discussion