BallerTalk wrote: Dr Huge Pecs wrote:
Or maybe we can wait for the actual facts to determine the outcome.
Just an idea.
That's why I said "if he's guilty" maybe we should read the post before we respond.
Just an idea
Sure sounded like you'd already made your mind up.
Dr Huge Pecs wrote:so zack.... z-bo, whatever, whoever... you put yourself in this mess. you're a multi millionaire willing to risk the rest of your career for a few bags of weed.
Dr Huge Pecs wrote:either way why defend the guy?
Dr Huge Pecs wrote:so enough of the z-bo fan boy pity parties
Dr Huge Pecs wrote:hope the kings can get rid of this guy.
But what do I know. Maybe you know Randolph personally. Or maybe you've purchased weed from him directly.
Or hell, maybe you were even there when the event went down.
Whatever the case I'm sure you have your reasons for your presumptive sentiments, ensuing equivocation notwithstanding.
Yeah the police report isn't presumptive at all.
The question is how the judge rules.
Way to cherry pick quotes though....millennial I presume. Don't let the "if he's guilty..." get in the way of your virtue signals or bizzare rants.
If he's guilty get rid of the over paid over the hill attempted drug dealer. Think this guy will do time? Not likely...you would though.... This dude's got 100 million and is still acting like a teenager.
But go ahead... He really cares that fanboys got his back.
I dont care either way actually, but if I were the kings I would be praying he gets banned, only because it was a bad signing... Not cuz he has a ton of pot. I like the grizzlies... I liked him on the grizzlies, but he's done as a player.
If he wants to play drug dealer... Who cares? but the cba says youll get banned. He knows that, looks like he might be making that decision... Why is anyone ever surprised when pro athletes go bankrupt after a few years out of the league?