Mwd1981 wrote:nedleeds wrote:Move towards your boat you useless turd. Unless he gives a ton back there's no point, just cut him next league year. How much did Deng give back?
Pretty harsh mate. Nobody forced Knicks to give him that contract, he was injured, and when he wasn’t Knicks didn’t give him any opportunity to live up to the contract.
Do you say no when someone offers you $80 million?
Noah seems like a good dude who shares his wealth with his community.
He messed up with weed, but as an nba player it might be better to smoke weed than gobble down pain killers. Ask Alonzo Mourning.
Agree with all that and it's a shared failure of course, bc any GM/team has a responsibility to independently verify/vet players and own the outcome of any signing they make.
That said, Noah did repeatedly go out of his way to assure Phil he was healthy and ready to go, so it's easy to see why some Knick fans are frustrated w/ Noah too.
“I ran into him on the streets of New York City. Just accidental — he’s out and he’s an active guy. So he wanted me to do a pull up on his arm to demonstrate that his shoulder’s in fine shape. I refused.”
Phil says their encounter helped convince him that health shouldn't stand in the way of signing the 31-year-old center.
Regardless, fans should be most upset w/ Phil for the money and years
Jackson said: "Derrick's still a young man at 27 [he turned 28 last week], Joakim just past 30. But both of them, I think, have some career left, even though they've had injuries. And it's what we call risk-reward. What was the risk and what was the reward? And I felt it was a minimal risk and a great reward if we were able to put together a good team."
To call $72M minimal risk is insanely off base. Rose was minimal risk and basically worked out. Noah was a tire fire.