eureca20 wrote:Kevin Willis wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:VanVleet is a lot better.
Yep. VanVleet is an all-star NBA champion. Not sure why Brunson would get the same amount, that would inflate salary all over the league. Put FVV on Dallas and they would probably beat GS because FVV is a better defender, can play off-ball and would get wide open shots because Doncic sucks in the defense.
Fred was an all star 2 years after he signed that contract. In a year where it wasn't the strongest group of Eastern All stars.
And he averaged 8 points off the bench on that championship run. My point being that his stock grew more after he signed that contract. Fred is a better player. Brunson is way way more efficient on offense. Brunson might be worth around that Fred VanVleet money. That is just the NBA. It also depends on the market. Who has cap room and what position do they need.
I understand your points and they are valid. I took a quick look at the players that are making around FVV.
Brogdan 21.25 (in millions)
Lo. Ball 20
Smart 19
Conley 22.68
Does Brunson belong in this group of annual salaries? I am taking into consideration that each person's contract lengths and how much is served. Also consider when a player signs a multi-year contract there is a projection going forward on what the player is worth now, what they will be worth in the future and the future salary cap. Guys in FVV's range tend to be borderline all-stars and all-nba teams. The tier above this group has Lowry, J. Murray, C. Paul, Russell, Irving, etc. The tier below this group has Derrick White, Bledsoe, Rubio, Murray (for now). I think he belongs more in this group but I am not a salary numbers guy to compare their current and project numbers. If you swap Brunson with anyone in FVV's tier it would improve the Mavs and hurt the other team that got swapped.
Ska needs to make a comeback.