njknicks wrote:Pr0nzingis wrote:njknicks wrote:
Point noted, but to re-sign Robinson they don't necessarily need cap space ( depending on Bird rights, structure of contract ).
Long-term, the goal is to win a championship -- does clearing all assets dry for a quality role player ( Jalen Brunson ) do that? No.
You swing for the fences / clear cap space / maneuver assets for a top 15 player .... not for a player who may not even be in the top 50.
Really questionable usage of 3 years of accumulation of assets / cap space etc.
Burks, Noel, Kemba = clearing all assets dry?
wtf is this guy smoking?
Assets as in #11 lotto pick, 6 second round picks & near expiring deals & cash
You leverage all of that to get a top 10 / 15 player ... not a rotational player.
So if i trade my house for 5 cars and then trade the 5 cars for a boat. The boat cost me 1 house and 5 cars? Are u dumb?
Let me do the math for u, with the 11th pick and 4 second rounders, Knicks received 3 1st rounders and dumped Kemba. Now they dumped Noel and Burcks for another 2 second rounders.
With the 11th pick and 6 second rounders the Knicks got 3 first round picks and 25M cap space. If Knicks sign Brunson, he problably becomes his best player.
How da **** trading garbage assets for better assets is "clearing all assets dry"?
Near expiring... wtf is that? Who da fack cares about near expiring?