Luv those Knicks wrote:I'm open to being wrong, but I think the only way to win is to get a true superstar (Giannis, Jokic), give them the max and build around them, or get a bunch of good, less than max players and win that way.
Mobley & Mitchell are good players, but I don't think you can build a championship team around those 2 players getting max deals.
With the salary cap of today, "True superstars" are underpaid, even on the supermax. All-stars are expected to get the max. Mobley/Wagner/Barnes are the young players who have shown the potential to become, or already have become, all-stars.
Yes, getting below value through the draft, un-drafted signings, reclamation projects etc., is important too (look at how the 2019 Raptors were built). And yes, knowing that it's very difficult to win a championship building around max players who are not at least in the top...60ish on both ends of the floor, is very difficult. It's perpetually been the problem with paying small, offensive oriented guards like Mitchell, Trae etc., or wings who don't guard well/shoot 3's well like Derozan, Siakam., or Bigs who can't stretch the floor like Allen, Gobert. They all get exposed in the playoffs.
Mobley at least has has shown improvement last year, hitting 37.3% of 3's, albeit on miniscule volume. He made DPOY-3 the previous season. If he can combine those two seasons and get some more usage, he's close to being a 20/10/3/1.5blk kinda guy on 55-60% from the field. That's easily an all-star, and thus, worthy of the max (and also a guy you could build around).
Same thing with Barnes...if his 3 gets better, he's a perennial all-star, and sniffs all-NBA.
Wagner I'd be more concerned about because I simply don't think he affects the game nearly as consistently as Mobley or Barnes. He's kind of a jack of all trades type without really being great at anything. A 3rd/4th banana type like a better 3p shooting, but worse at everything else Siakam type. But ultimately ORL was pretty pressured to keep him based on his year 2 play, and pray that the 3p% regression was just a blip.