LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26

Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro

RealGM Wiretap
RealGM
Posts: 114,226
And1: 313
Joined: Mar 19, 2013

LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#1 » by RealGM Wiretap » Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:02 pm

LeBron James understands the Los Angeles Lakers' decision to pivot to building around Luka Doncic given the fact one player is nearing retirement and the other is in the middle of his prime. However, nuance was sometimes lost during the transition as the organization made clear their priorities had changed.


The Lakers acquired Doncic in a February trade for Anthony Davis, signaling a shift away from their longtime superstar. Doncic had never asked to be traded to the Lakers and intended to sign a supermax extension with the Dallas Mavericks, while James had chosen the Lakers in 2018 when the team had missed the playoffs five consecutive seasons.


The Lakers did not offer James a contract extension beyond the 2025-26 season, marking the first time in his 23-year career a team hasn't prioritized keeping him long-term. James subsequently picked up his $52.6 million player option.


Since the Doncic trade on February 1, the Lakers have signaled this transition through several notable actions. They gave James minimal notice about the Davis-for-Doncic trade, though sources said he forgave this transgression due to his respect for Doncic.


The organization immediately attempted to pair Doncic with athletic young center Mark Williams. James and Davis had previously requested the franchise acquire a true center without success.


When the Buss family sold a majority stake to Mark Walter on June 18, Doncic received advance notice and posted congratulations on social media. James was not given the same courtesy and made no public acknowledgment.


James has responded to this treatment by dropping cryptic hints about his future, a pattern he's followed when frustrated with franchises.


"Nothing LeBron does is a coincidence," said one source who knows him well.


After the Lakers' playoff elimination, he referenced Davis' trade request when asked about physicality changes.


"No comment," James said. "I never say that because my guy AD said what he needed and he was gone the following week."


James has also posted social media content referencing his Cleveland Cavaliers tenure, including a July 4 repost of Lakers broadcaster Allie Clifton wearing a Cavaliers jersey.


"We understand the difficulty in winning now while preparing for the future. We do want to evaluate what's best for LeBron at this stage in his life and career," Rich Paul said in a statement to ESPN's Shams Charania.


"He wants to make every season he has left count, and the Lakers understand that, are supportive and want what's best for him."


The statement immediately sent the NBA world into speculation mode. Though James picked up his player option, the message read like a potential goodbye letter, suggesting a larger strategy was developing.


Multiple executives around the league began considering whether to pursue James, including the Golden State Warriors who attempted to trade for him in 2023-24. One Eastern Conference executive believed James wanted out of Los Angeles entirely.


The gigantic trade that landed Doncic in Los Angeles created new realities, including James becoming an expiring contract for the first time in his career. It represents the strongest sign yet that his Lakers tenure may be nearing its end. While it is not explicit, the Lakers have signaled that they intend to move on from James after the 2025-26 season when his contract expires.

Via Ramona Shelburne, Brian Windhorst/ESPN

User avatar
sChOlaRlY_Magi
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,850
And1: 405
Joined: Nov 30, 2007
Location: Palanthus
     

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#2 » by sChOlaRlY_Magi » Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:11 am

Lakers taking that “No Kings” to the next level!
NightWatch
Senior
Posts: 659
And1: 598
Joined: Oct 25, 2022

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#3 » by NightWatch » Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:47 am

lol that’s funny
Vegeta10176
Starter
Posts: 2,204
And1: 277
Joined: Jun 27, 2018

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#4 » by Vegeta10176 » Sat Jul 12, 2025 7:39 am

Lakers whole thing is cap space 2027.. And they can't tank next season because their 2027 pick is with Utah albeit top protected.. So why wouldn't they offer LeBron a one year extension I guess getting under the tax cap might be there intention next season to reset repeater tax but Luka is going to wait two years in the middle of his prime for them to maybe do something...AD was waiting 4 years for them to maybe do something and they did they traded him I mean Luka has to look at this and go ok what happens to me in 6 years.. I also don't get not informing LeBron about the sale and only telling Luka.. LeBron should ask for a trade and obviously could demand basically the trade he wants as long as contracts are expiring Lakers would probably have to take it and no picks or anything just either contracts they want or expirings..
Hellcrooner
Analyst
Posts: 3,116
And1: 2,514
Joined: Aug 04, 2014
         

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#5 » by Hellcrooner » Sat Jul 12, 2025 8:15 am

Thats what happen when you are always opening your mouth about contending but you are not really into it and do not allow it to happen by taking the vets minimum salary.
User avatar
NoStatsGuy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,020
And1: 2,231
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Location: Germany
 

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#6 » by NoStatsGuy » Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:12 pm

Hellcrooner wrote:Thats what happen when you are always opening your mouth about contending but you are not really into it and do not allow it to happen by taking the vets minimum salary.


yea you guys go ahead with your double standards. lebron was 2nd team all nba and is still a top 20-25 player. but he should take the veteran minimum. allright :D

not a fan of how lebron handles these situations, with all the cryptic tweets and stuff and i am by no means a lebron fan. but cmon now. why should he take the veteran minimum? why is SGA, giannis, jokic, etc. not taking the vet minimum to help his team? you could ask that to any nba player. because they are rich enough to pass on some money.
im bout dat action boss
Hellcrooner
Analyst
Posts: 3,116
And1: 2,514
Joined: Aug 04, 2014
         

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#7 » by Hellcrooner » Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:57 pm

NoStatsGuy wrote:
Hellcrooner wrote:Thats what happen when you are always opening your mouth about contending but you are not really into it and do not allow it to happen by taking the vets minimum salary.


yea you guys go ahead with your double standards. lebron was 2nd team all nba and is still a top 20-25 player. but he should take the veteran minimum. allright :D

not a fan of how lebron handles these situations, with all the cryptic tweets and stuff and i am by no means a lebron fan. but cmon now. why should he take the veteran minimum? why is SGA, giannis, jokic, etc. not taking the vet minimum to help his team? you could ask that to any nba player. because they are rich enough to pass on some money.


Because Sga, Giannis, Jokic are NOT 40 years old and do NOT need 2 more rings to get to the target wich is match that guys 6 and win the discussion by longevity.
User avatar
Isiahthomass
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,380
And1: 873
Joined: Aug 08, 2010
     

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#8 » by Isiahthomass » Sat Jul 12, 2025 8:11 pm

"Forgave this transgression" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,021
And1: 8,085
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#9 » by nedleeds » Sat Jul 12, 2025 11:48 pm

"he forgave this transgression" **** just retire you flopping diva.

Or better yet, don't pick up your player option if you don't like it. Instead we will get passive aggressive tampax Lebron all year.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
Pickled Prunes
General Manager
Posts: 8,765
And1: 1,382
Joined: Sep 14, 2010

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#10 » by Pickled Prunes » Sun Jul 13, 2025 2:15 am

Vegeta10176 wrote:Lakers whole thing is cap space 2027.. And they can't tank next season because their 2027 pick is with Utah albeit top protected.. So why wouldn't they offer LeBron a one year extension I guess getting under the tax cap might be there intention next season to reset repeater tax but Luka is going to wait two years in the middle of his prime for them to maybe do something...AD was waiting 4 years for them to maybe do something and they did they traded him I mean Luka has to look at this and go ok what happens to me in 6 years.. I also don't get not informing LeBron about the sale and only telling Luka.. LeBron should ask for a trade and obviously could demand basically the trade he wants as long as contracts are expiring Lakers would probably have to take it and no picks or anything just either contracts they want or expirings..

The biggest issue is that Luka is a younger version of Lebron (minus defense). Their idea of playing off-ball is resting on the perimeter. They are borderline redundant on the floor together.

Besides that, LAL could have a ton of space next summer. Their active cap for 26/27 is only $102m.
Vegeta10176
Starter
Posts: 2,204
And1: 277
Joined: Jun 27, 2018

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#11 » by Vegeta10176 » Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:24 am

Hellcrooner wrote:Thats what happen when you are always opening your mouth about contending but you are not really into it and do not allow it to happen by taking the vets minimum salary.

Lol if he took the minimum it would of opened 10mil in cap space you casuals are so funny
Vegeta10176
Starter
Posts: 2,204
And1: 277
Joined: Jun 27, 2018

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#12 » by Vegeta10176 » Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:26 am

Hellcrooner wrote:
NoStatsGuy wrote:
Hellcrooner wrote:Thats what happen when you are always opening your mouth about contending but you are not really into it and do not allow it to happen by taking the vets minimum salary.


yea you guys go ahead with your double standards. lebron was 2nd team all nba and is still a top 20-25 player. but he should take the veteran minimum. allright :D

not a fan of how lebron handles these situations, with all the cryptic tweets and stuff and i am by no means a lebron fan. but cmon now. why should he take the veteran minimum? why is SGA, giannis, jokic, etc. not taking the vet minimum to help his team? you could ask that to any nba player. because they are rich enough to pass on some money.


Because Sga, Giannis, Jokic are NOT 40 years old and do NOT need 2 more rings to get to the target wich is match that guys 6 and win the discussion by longevity.[/quote

Your a casual because taking the minimum opens 10mil in cap space.. Lebron probably would of done some sort of discount on a one and one to keep them further under the second apron if they said they were going to try to contend and came to him but they didn't do that..
Vegeta10176
Starter
Posts: 2,204
And1: 277
Joined: Jun 27, 2018

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#13 » by Vegeta10176 » Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:27 am

Pickled Prunes wrote:
Vegeta10176 wrote:Lakers whole thing is cap space 2027.. And they can't tank next season because their 2027 pick is with Utah albeit top protected.. So why wouldn't they offer LeBron a one year extension I guess getting under the tax cap might be there intention next season to reset repeater tax but Luka is going to wait two years in the middle of his prime for them to maybe do something...AD was waiting 4 years for them to maybe do something and they did they traded him I mean Luka has to look at this and go ok what happens to me in 6 years.. I also don't get not informing LeBron about the sale and only telling Luka.. LeBron should ask for a trade and obviously could demand basically the trade he wants as long as contracts are expiring Lakers would probably have to take it and no picks or anything just either contracts they want or expirings..

The biggest issue is that Luka is a younger version of Lebron (minus defense). Their idea of playing off-ball is resting on the perimeter. They are borderline redundant on the floor together.

Besides that, LAL could have a ton of space next summer. Their active cap for 26/27 is only $102m.


Who will they get to build a real contender around luka? Are they resigning Reeves? LeBron was playing defence and scoring luka was the one playing poorly for his standards anyway
Vegeta10176
Starter
Posts: 2,204
And1: 277
Joined: Jun 27, 2018

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#14 » by Vegeta10176 » Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:29 am

Lakers tanked their rep as star friendly.. Mark will have some repairing to do.. Luka will sign the extension cause it gives you the money but he cant trust them anymore than dallas.. Some other team should be whispering in his ear to come play for them and they look after their stars..
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,331
And1: 4,383
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#15 » by closg00 » Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:02 pm

We are close to being free of his “decisions” and drama, forever.
Pickled Prunes
General Manager
Posts: 8,765
And1: 1,382
Joined: Sep 14, 2010

Re: LeBron James Responding To Lakers' Signal They're Moving On From Him After 2025-26 

Post#16 » by Pickled Prunes » Sun Jul 13, 2025 8:11 pm

Vegeta10176 wrote:
Pickled Prunes wrote:
Vegeta10176 wrote:Lakers whole thing is cap space 2027.. And they can't tank next season because their 2027 pick is with Utah albeit top protected.. So why wouldn't they offer LeBron a one year extension I guess getting under the tax cap might be there intention next season to reset repeater tax but Luka is going to wait two years in the middle of his prime for them to maybe do something...AD was waiting 4 years for them to maybe do something and they did they traded him I mean Luka has to look at this and go ok what happens to me in 6 years.. I also don't get not informing LeBron about the sale and only telling Luka.. LeBron should ask for a trade and obviously could demand basically the trade he wants as long as contracts are expiring Lakers would probably have to take it and no picks or anything just either contracts they want or expirings..

The biggest issue is that Luka is a younger version of Lebron (minus defense). Their idea of playing off-ball is resting on the perimeter. They are borderline redundant on the floor together.

Besides that, LAL could have a ton of space next summer. Their active cap for 26/27 is only $102m.


Who will they get to build a real contender around luka? Are they resigning Reeves? LeBron was playing defence and scoring luka was the one playing poorly for his standards anyway

1) If they are smart, they will trade Reaves the day after his next 30/7/8 game. He is beyond great on this contract, but overrated enough that I worry about the next contract.

2) Yes, Lebron is still a better defender than Luka and he has grown more efficient over the years. But "years" is the most important word in that sentence. Lebron is old. LAL might get 10 more years out of Luka if he starts taking better care of his body. He's clearly the player they need to build around. Fortunately, building around Lebron is just like building around Luka. They are incredibly similar on the offensive end. Unfortunately, LAL haven't been doing a great job of that since the Bubble-chip. Either way, what isn't ideal is having them both on the floor at the same time. Since age makes the decision easy, why waste a minute of Luka's Lakers tenure?

Return to Wiretap Discussion