Aspiration Bid More Than Double Intuit For Clippers' Arena Naming Rights

Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro

RealGM Wiretap
RealGM
Posts: 115,173
And1: 313
Joined: Mar 19, 2013

Aspiration Bid More Than Double Intuit For Clippers' Arena Naming Rights 

Post#1 » by RealGM Wiretap » Mon Sep 8, 2025 8:43 pm

The Los Angeles Clippers received a bid from Aspiration for naming rights to their new arena worth nearly double that Intuit eventually paid, which was $550 million over 23 years. The Clippers decided to move forward with the offer from Intuit as they were the most established company.


Aspiration instead executed a jersey patch sponsorship with the Clippers and other promotional activations.


Aspiration has come into attention this year as they have gone bankrupt with one of its co-founders pleading guilty to framing investors. Aspiration also had a $28 million endorsement deal with Kawhi Leonard that the NBA is currently investigating amid allegations of potential salary cap circumvention on the part of the Clippers.


Both the Clippers and Steve Ballmer have denied any violations of the NBA's collective bargaining agreement.

Via Ramona Shelburne/ESPN

User avatar
deeps6x
RealGM
Posts: 10,159
And1: 6,220
Joined: Nov 28, 2008
     

Re: Aspiration Bid More Than Double Intuit For Clippers' Arena Naming Rights 

Post#2 » by deeps6x » Tue Sep 9, 2025 12:33 am

The Clippers decided to move forward with the offer from Intuit as they were the most established company.

So they were selling the naming rights, not for money, but to be associated with a company?

This smells so fishy.

You don't turn down double the money unless you have a VERY good reason. Kinda like how Kawhi decided to walk away from a couple more championships in Toronto, to go 'home' for 'less, (more)' money.
Spoiler:
BoyzNTheHood wrote:I apologize, I have incredibly small genitalia
PaoliBulldog
Ballboy
Posts: 7
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 05, 2021
       

Re: Aspiration Bid More Than Double Intuit For Clippers' Arena Naming Rights 

Post#3 » by PaoliBulldog » Tue Sep 9, 2025 7:53 pm

I'm assuming you didn't read the story, which explains exactly why the Clippers wanted nothing to do with Aspiration.

deeps6x wrote:The Clippers decided to move forward with the offer from Intuit as they were the most established company.

So they were selling the naming rights, not for money, but to be associated with a company?

This smells so fishy.

You don't turn down double the money unless you have a VERY good reason. Kinda like how Kawhi decided to walk away from a couple more championships in Toronto, to go 'home' for 'less, (more)' money.
User avatar
lonzo_pelota
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,478
And1: 6,670
Joined: Jul 28, 2017
   

Re: Aspiration Bid More Than Double Intuit For Clippers' Arena Naming Rights 

Post#4 » by lonzo_pelota » Wed Sep 10, 2025 5:54 am

Clippers brass almost conceded to naming the new arena "Uncle Dennis Arena" as it was a request/stipulation in Kawhi's previous contract made by the uncle/charlatan, but Ballmer and Uncle Dennis made another agreement work in lieu of that request which is unknown.

Return to Wiretap Discussion