The Bulls' Surge And The Conundrum Of Tanking Franchises

User avatar
RealGM Articles
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,786
And1: 45
Joined: Mar 20, 2013

The Bulls' Surge And The Conundrum Of Tanking Franchises 

Post#1 » by RealGM Articles » Tue Jan 2, 2018 9:32 pm

The Bulls are two-and-a-half games out of last place, if we’re understanding it that way, and they have the seventh-worst record in the league with the Hornets, Nets, and Suns nipping at their toes. This was supposed to be a year submerged in the tank for Chicago and it still could be—Gar Forman and Jim Paxson, in a twist, did everything perversely right by assembling a roster of overmatched-to-promising young players and a few so-so vets—but what could credibly have been called the most moribund team in the league a few weeks ago has been doing a funny thing for the last little while: they’ve been winning. What looked at first like a surefire bottom-three squad now appears able to miss the postseason by a mile instead of several. 


Is this a bad thing? The enlightened position of our day posits that it is. The Bulls are going nowhere special at the moment. They have very little in the chamber in terms of potential. Lauri Markkanen is having a nice rookie season, but he’s not Finnish Anthony Davis. Kris Dunn is trending toward good bench player/below average starter territory. Zach LaVine, who’s set to return from a knee injury in mid-to-late January, is an immensely gifted athlete who has yet to demonstrate that he’s a particularly useful basketball player. If the Bulls are going to build themselves into a circa 2022 powerhouse or even, say, whatever the Wizards are at the moment, they’re almost definitely going to need at least one or two high lottery selections going forward. Winning now—not even chasing a playoff spot, merely going on a mirage-y hot streak—messes with that. 


And yet there is a slight comic and inspiring thrill, if you can embrace myopia and give yourself over to pure feeling, in watching a team that should hardly beat anybody string together some Ws. Especially considering the Bulls started the year not just poorly, but with clown-honking dysfunction, with Bobby Portis socking Nikola Mirotic in the face during a preseason practice, concussing Mirotic and fracturing his face. Portis was suspended for eight games and then somehow didn’t get cut or traded away, so he and Mirotic kept uneasily coexisting in the same locker room as the Bulls proceeded to lose 20 of their first 23 contests of the season.


Portis and Mirotic still evidently hate each other, but the team has been 10-and-4 since early December, recently dropping a couple close games against Washington and Portland. They’ve had one of the best defenses in the league over that span and while their offense—isn’t that supposed to be the thing Fred Hoiberg is good at? he’s never demonstrated much acumen in that department—is abysmal, they’ve been scoring enough to get by. Markkanen and Portis can both space the floor fine and Mirotic’s long-range shooting (46.6 percent) has hit Korverian heights. Robin Lopez is doing that Robin Lopez thing where he scores more than he has any right to, chipping in a tick under 13 points per game. In summary, what the Bulls are pulling off shouldn’t be possible—not like space flight, but in a hoo-boy-that’s-a-tight-parallel-parking-job sense. They aren’t any good, but they’ve been good for a while. That’s something to celebrate, if quietly in your living room, out of the earshot of anybody who can’t be bothered to care about Jerian Grant’s slim three-and-d prospects. 


Back to the bigger picture: this purple patch the Bulls are enjoying isn’t indicative of much. It’s not the beginning of a great surge and a nine-game losing streak will likely soon find them, because you can’t play Denzel Valentine 28 minutes a night and get away with it completely. These wins are hurting their chances of ever becoming more than improbably competent. Finishing 17-18 with something like the eighth pick in the draft is just about the most disastrous outcome their season could produce. 


Which lays bare the conundrum facing tanking franchises. Most modern fans understand that if their team is one of the six or seven worst in the NBA, they might as well be the absolute worst. That’s the most direct path toward title contention, or at least being worth a damn a few years down the line. This knowledge, while useful, also poisons their ability to enjoy their teams, since it essentially transforms the fans of bad-to-mediocre squads into standings-watchers rather than, y’know, people who watch twenty, thirty, sixty games per season hoping to be entertained by a win. It turns something straightforwardly fun—hey, would you look at that: the Bulls haven’t sucked in a month—into a source of worry and conflicted feelings. The team keeps winning, and you ask yourself should I be happy about this? And, really, you should and you shouldn’t. There’s no firm answer, only the edgy silence of wanting one.

nick51388
Ballboy
Posts: 1
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
         

Re: The Bulls' Surge And The Conundrum Of Tanking Franchises 

Post#2 » by nick51388 » Thu Jan 4, 2018 4:49 pm

id really like to know what it is you're drinking in that picture, must be some reallyyyy good stuff..

Quite honestly, this article should be a career-ending move on your part, as someone with such low basketball knowledge should not be writing about basketball.

Here's a few key callouts:

The Bulls are going nowhere special at the moment. They have very little in the chamber in terms of potential. Lauri Markkanen is having a nice rookie season, but he’s not Finnish Anthony Davis. Kris Dunn is trending toward good bench player/below average starter territory. Zach LaVine, who’s set to return from a knee injury in mid-to-late January, is an immensely gifted athlete who has yet to demonstrate that he’s a particularly useful basketball player.

On the contrary, the Bulls finally have a young talented core and future looks bright. They are fun to watch, as they begin to increasingly gel and learn Hoiberg's system. Dunn runs the team beautifully, setting up good look after good look, not to mention is dirty clutch and an elite defender (top 5 in league in steals per game). He's an improved 3 and turnover cutdown away from being a star point and great leader on a contender. Good bench player / below avg starter is that a joke?! Bulls woulda taken him as high as 3 in draft and hes already showing he wouldve been worth of that. Markkanen is having a killer rookie year..nobody expects him to be Anthony Davis good, but he is already good and has potential to be great, still has so much to grow. Lavine is a high-flying all-star talent, whose impact when he returns will be HUGE. Bulls have been playing good without a #1 option, insert one in place of Holiday/Valentine and its a big difference. Not to mention he is far and away the best shooter and shot creator on team.

They’ve had one of the best defenses in the league over that span and while their offense—isn’t that supposed to be the thing Fred Hoiberg is good at? he’s never demonstrated much acumen in that department—is abysmal, they’ve been scoring enough to get by.

Firstly, isnt it a good thing having 1 of the best defenses over that span? Offensive rating has been in top half of league as well, and will improve even more w Lavine back. Net rating already top 5 in league over past 15 games. All this during growing pains and players still not full chemistry reached yet with each other or with the system.

In regards to how we should be tanking vs winning, that you can debate..although a top 4 pick would be nice, the successful development of our young core and creation of a winning atmosphere trumps all. I have nothing wrong w trading away pieces that dont fit in our future, and if it results in helping us get a top 4 pick so be it great..but you dont hinder the growth of our core, thats something you cheer for and enjoy the ride.
User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,459
And1: 1,406
Joined: May 23, 2001

Re: The Bulls' Surge And The Conundrum Of Tanking Franchises 

Post#3 » by theman » Thu Jan 4, 2018 5:26 pm

Which is why returning to each lottery team having an equal chance at #1 makes a lot more sense. It is why they put the lottery in to begin with.
"Christmas is for cops and kids" - Whitey Bulger
hoopsfan2424
Sophomore
Posts: 200
And1: 108
Joined: Aug 03, 2014

Re: The Bulls' Surge And The Conundrum Of Tanking Franchises 

Post#4 » by hoopsfan2424 » Sun Jan 7, 2018 7:39 pm

Colin i hate to be harsh but your style of writing is annoying. please stop using so many unnecessary adverbs. "improbably competent" is not a clever phrase, it's dumb and distracting to the reader. it's clear that you're a Zach Lowe fan and he, too, is annoying.

Return to Articles Discussion