BorkLazer wrote:chipchipperson wrote:BorkLazer wrote:
I always find it funny how people casually ignore stuff like this. I bet everyone reading this thread read this post, and no one is going to respond. Just heads buried in sand...
An illegal practice in the offseason? Unheard of and unforgivable! The edge that pad less scrimmage must have given them was insane!
A player faking an injury? That sure hasnt happened 17 times a game since the 80's. And no patriot has ever even considering doing anything of that nature.
Giving some decrepit, drooling retiree some pocket money on the low? How dare those filthy steelers.
And oh, the best one, where they're responsible for steroids pervading American sports because some **** guy said so. Congrats. Let's just ignore how your source is a circle-jerk of ass-munching patriots fan trying to make themselves feel better about their shady ass team's shady ass actions.
All the real dirt from spygate was burned on-site at foxboro by goodell's goons. The pats were doing far more than cataloguing a library full of stolen plays and signals(which in and of itself is bad enough) and stealing play books from the road teams locker room. Just be happy that goodell didn't want an "mlb steroids" type of pr nightmare, otherwise your team wouldn't have had a first round pick for a **** decade.
Anti-pats people are annoying as ****. I don't even hate the pats for mastering their art, but when delusional people say delusional **** it's impossible not to notice. And when they begin to scale "cheating" to suit their **** agendas it just becomes sad.
Wow are you mad or something man? I love how you accuse others of 'scaling cheating to suit their agendas' when you literally do it within your first two sentences
Seriously. The hypocrisy in that post was impressive. First the "scaling cheating" bit, then later how he calls me out for the quality of my source, then proceeds to give no source at all for his claims about what the Pats were doing. Just embarrassing stuff.
Also notice how, when countering the Steelers stuff, he touches the easier points, but strategically avoids the one about Tomlin stepping on the field to affect a play in progress.
And of course, as always, the convenient framing to minimize the severity of anything not involving the Patriots, and maximize anything involving them.
chipchipperson wrote:A player faking an injury? That sure hasnt happened 17 times a game since the 80's. And no patriot has ever even considering doing anything of that nature.
Me, momentarily pretending to be chipchipperson, wrote:A team trying to steal signs? That sure hasnt happened continuously since the dawn of sports. And no team other than the Patriots has ever even considering doing anything of that nature.
Which is why it's such a head-shaker to see him acting like he's taking the high-ground and merely calling us out on "delusional ****" and "agendas". Can't even see his own agenda and biases, apparently.