jc23 wrote:i still dont know much about the league and how salaries play a factor. Before i started watching i heard the Aces were a super team, it now seems like the Liberty are a super team. So how does this happen in the wnba? is it players that just want to play with each other, is a a salary or market thing, just good drafting and trades? basically are there any big differences in how teams become greatin the wnba vs in the NBA. And how long do these teams last, is it dynasty after dynasty or are there rules that eventually make it difficult to hold onto a team of stars.
Before the LIberty, "superteams" were generally built through the draft. Back to back #1 overall picks is the most common way.
Every team to have back to back #1's has won multiple titles. Seattle twice with Sue and Lauren Jackson, then Jewell and Stewie. Aces had 3-straight #1 picks (they probably didn't become a superteam until they signed Chelsea Gray though).
With the Lynx dynasty, Maya and Seimone Augustus were drafted, but Whalen and Brunson came as free-agents (before Maya was drafted).
Mercury and Sparks won their titles on players drafted #1 overall (DT, Griner, Candace, Nneka, Leslie in the '97 Allocation).
The original superteam (Houston Comets) were a different story, but it was basically draft. Original 8 teams had 2 veteran players "allocated" to them by the league to start. They somehow gave the Comets Swoopes and Cynthia Cooper (Coop had been playing overseas for a decade so nobody really had any idea she was still as good as she was). And Houston also got the #1 pick in the college draft where they got Tina Thompson.
Fever certainly following the super team blueprint.
We'll see how the new CBA and expansion change things in terms of super team builds.
Though, I do think it's already starting to shift away from #1 overall pick blue print with all the talent coming out of college and internationally. Liberty and Lynx lean on incredible depth. For the Lynx, their star was drafted #6 overall.