Mephariel wrote:Mephariel wrote:MrBigShot wrote:
Huge difference between outlier production and outlier play style. Nobody in women's basketball past or present plays like caitlin.
She is an absolutely incredible talent, electrifying to watch and deserves all of the accolades and praise she's gotten, on the basis of merit, not race.
I remember people trying to argue "she's not good enough for the olympic team", only for her to look like an MVP caliber player a month after the olympics.
If it is about merit, then production matters right?
And this is the problem with a lot of Clark fans. She wasn't good enough for the Olympic team at the time of selection. At the very least, there was a legit argument she wasn't good enough or why others should be ahead of her. What happens months afterwards has no relevancy. Instead of supporting the players on the Olympics team, Clark fans threw a hissy fit for months. That kind of toxicity is why discussion around Clark can't focus on just basketball. You want it to be about merit, not race, then set the example.
i don't think she wasn't good enough for the Olympic team at the time of selection. if they picked players based on picking the 12 best women basketball players that gave the team the best chance to succeed she would have been selected. there were other factors at play such as DT making history with her 6th olympics and brittney griner showing up for USA after what had all happened in Russia. this was the oldest roster we ever carried into the olympics and it almost cost us. let's not pretend the selections this time around were based purely on merit.