mojo13 wrote:A team of D-leaguers that is familiar with each other can easily finish in the top 7 of the Americas against others countries who also will have no NBA players, no EuroLeague players and no EuroCup players (the no EL and EC players has not been confirmed yet - if it has please post).
The Pan-Am games should be right about where the level of these games will be.
Plus the D-League is going to have better players this coming year with the additional of 60 new two-way NBA contracts and a tripling of the rest of the salaries.
The Pan Am Games was mostly the B teams of most of those national teams. If you take away NBA players, EuroLeague and EuroCup players from an A team, that is still quite a bit better than B teams, which is pretty much what was at the pan American Games.
EuroLeague and EuroCup players won't be there if NBA players aren't. The last time I read an interview with EuroLeague's CEO, he was asked about it, and he said (paraphrasing) "if the NBA players won't be there, then why should we let our players play?" Then he said something like, "if the clubs allow them to play, we won't get in the way".
Well, the chances are very small the clubs will let any important players play during the middle of the season. Only probably the guys that don't play in a rotation. Canada and USA couldn't expect any players to play under those circumstances, where the club has control over it.
Triple salaries isn't going to mean all that much in level of D-League. Rookies to the pros, from NCAA DI come to Greek League teams, and sign with low level teams (the poorest ones in the league) and start off at like $230,000 a year in how NBA counts salary...I am talking about guys from mid major NCAA schools with zero NBA and zero D-League playing time, that are true rookies, never played in Europe, and that are signing in the poorest teams. That's still like 5 times what D-League would pay.
And the teams from Latin America are not boxed into NBA, EuroLeague and EuroCup players at all. They have plenty of good players playing in leagues like Puerto Rico, Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela, Mexico, plus Americas League. Venezuela won an Americas Championship tournament, with their opponents having NBA and EuroLeague/EuroCup players.......and with themselves having a team consisting of FIBA Americas League players.
So no, I seriously don't think it's remotely close to being easy for a D-League team to qualify. 7 places is a lot of leeway......but to say they easily qualify is a stretch. You have to understand, I watch Americas League, and it's far better than D-League. So just players from the best Latin American leagues can give any D-League team plenty of problems.
At a very bare minimum, USA should select some real pro players from Europe and China, and Australia, mixed in with some D-League and/or college players, or something like that. 12 D-League players would be a very foolish experiment.
A few years back the D-League all star select team toured Europe, playing teams in Spain, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, then China....they played only second division teams from Spain, Greece, and Italy, and lost all 6 of those games. They played against 2 of the worst Lithuanian first division teams, and went 1-1. They played 2 games against first division Chinese teams, and went 1-1, for a 2-8 record (0-6 against 2nd division Italy, Greece, Spain)...granted, it's a bit different, since those were clubs teams, but you get the point.
So, I don't see anything being easy in making top 7 in Americas region, if they actually send 12 D-League players.