POR - CHAR

amcoolio · Post #21 » by **amcoolio** » Fri May 23, 2008 1:18 am

Actually I wouldn't do the Portland deal. I would rather have Randolph, who'd be the best player in the trade.

Frye won't get any playing time if May is healthy since he is better and Jack is a worser Felton, something we don't need as a backup PG.

Post #22 » by **fatlever** » Fri May 23, 2008 4:06 pm

kwolge - after 3 years of lurking, this is the topic that brings you out of hiding? well, welcome to the boards. ...and i agree with you.

Post #23 » by **PhilipNelsonFan** » Sun May 25, 2008 8:29 am

One man's opinion, but Portland does that initial deal on the condition that Kevin Love is available at 9. Morrison would be a reclamation project but he still has upside.

doc.end · Post #24 » by **doc.end** » Mon May 26, 2008 10:24 am

BigSlam wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I think this would be an amazing deal for us.

Felts - FA?
Brewer - Hammer
Swish - Dude - Ammo
Boozer - McMay - Davidson
EO50 - 2nd rd pick (DeVon Hardin?) - Hollins

Gives us the on ball defender with handles we long for as well as a big who can play the pick and pop as well as the pick and roll.

I love it.

That's probably the best realistic(?) trade for us I've seen on this board ever.