Yeah, I was going to do it a couple of weeks ago actually but I found that J Rich one and switched to it instead since this is the Bobcats board. But your right since it's the finals I figured what the hell.
Where do you watch all those games though? Most of the games I've watched before is during the World Cups, a few MLS games etc...are Club games and Euro cup games on anywhere consistently here in the states or do you have to buy some sort of package?
Btw, since you mentioned it, I can't wait for the Olympics. That will give me plenty to watch this summer for sure, although I'm one of the few ones that prefer the winter games.
who do you want to win the finals?
Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben
-
fatlever
- Senior Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 58,844
- And1: 15,437
- Joined: Jun 04, 2001
- Location: Terrapin Station
-
chabber wrote:Yeah, I was going to do it a couple of weeks ago actually but I found that J Rich one and switched to it instead since this is the Bobcats board. But your right since it's the finals I figured what the hell.
Where do you watch all those games though? Most of the games I've watched before is during the World Cups, a few MLS games etc...are Club games and Euro cup games on anywhere consistently here in the states or do you have to buy some sort of package?
Btw, since you mentioned it, I can't wait for the Olympics. That will give me plenty to watch this summer for sure, although I'm one of the few ones that prefer the winter games.
espn, espn classic and espn2 show most of the USA games. they also show most of the major champions league games. they will be showing the euro cup.
fox soccer channel (147 on TW digital cable) shows a ton of premier league games and italian series A games and some mls games. whenever i dont have anything specific to watch on tv i turn to fox soccer channel. i used to do the same thing with nbatv, but they just keep playing he same crap over and over year after year.
if you have the dish you can also get games on setana (sp?) but i think you have to pay extra for that.
-
chrbal
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,521
- And1: 1,966
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Lakers, by an ever so slight edge. To me this is like asking "would you rather drink DIP-SPIT Pepsi or FOWL-EGG SMELL COKE?"
I never like when free agents chase playoff teams (Malone and Payton started it). With the Celtics you have "forceout Cassell" and "I'll sign when I'm good and ready (and oh yeah when a favorite emerges) Brown".
I don't like Rivers as a coach. And I've always hated Pollard, because he used to always blast the Pistons every chance he got. It would always sound like a child talking about a teacher he or she disliked the most.
He wasn't much of anything as a rookie, Pistons traded him to the Hawks, they cut him and he signed with the Kings...which established him as a good backup center. So tell me again, what did the Pistons do wrong? The Pistons had some pretty good players in front of him and Scot was a rookie. Wasn't like he was a lottery pick joining a team with a thin frontcourt.
So long story short, I'll say the Lakers...because I see them as the lesser of two evils.
I never like when free agents chase playoff teams (Malone and Payton started it). With the Celtics you have "forceout Cassell" and "I'll sign when I'm good and ready (and oh yeah when a favorite emerges) Brown".
I don't like Rivers as a coach. And I've always hated Pollard, because he used to always blast the Pistons every chance he got. It would always sound like a child talking about a teacher he or she disliked the most.
He wasn't much of anything as a rookie, Pistons traded him to the Hawks, they cut him and he signed with the Kings...which established him as a good backup center. So tell me again, what did the Pistons do wrong? The Pistons had some pretty good players in front of him and Scot was a rookie. Wasn't like he was a lottery pick joining a team with a thin frontcourt.
So long story short, I'll say the Lakers...because I see them as the lesser of two evils.