Howard/Bass for Wallace or JRich/Okafor?

creative1 · Post #1 » by **creative1** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:41 pm

I'm not even sure if the salaries work but any interest? Seems like pretty fair value on both sides. We could throw Stack in if need be to give a good expiring plus a veteran SG to fill the void of losing J. Rich or Wallace. Thoughts? If you don' think so, what would it take to make that deal happen?

Post #2 » by **BigSlam** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 12:06 am

Not even close.

It would take more than you have and even more than you are willing to give up to land Wallace or JRich/Okafor in a trade.

2LeTTeRS · Post #3 » by **2LeTTeRS** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:01 am

We would be giving up the 2 best players in that deal. Thats an easy no.

TheBobcatDan · Post #4 » by **TheBobcatDan** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:16 am

Make it Nowitzki and Howard or Bass (if Bass something else has to come to balance it) for Wallace and Okafor and then we'll be talking about a possible deal.

Post #5 » by **Paydro70** » Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:10 am

At first I misunderstood, and thought this was a deal for just one of the three... in which case we would of course be interested and could offer something else in return. Not sure what they'd want, but I think Howard/Bass for Wallace+whatever... maybe even #9, would be a trade worth discussing.

Nowitzki and Howard would be a ludicrous trade for Wallace/Okafor, but so would Howard/Bass for TWO of our top 3.

Rich4114 · Post #6 » by **Rich4114** » Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:49 am

Paydro70 wrote:At first I misunderstood, and thought this was a deal for just one of the three... in which case we would of course be interested and could offer something else in return. Not sure what they'd want, but I think Howard/Bass for Wallace+whatever... maybe even #9, would be a trade worth discussing.

Nowitzki and Howard would be a ludicrous trade for Wallace/Okafor, but so would Howard/Bass for TWO of our top 3.

Ditto that.