ImageImage

GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm

Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben

User avatar
667Club
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,357
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 12, 2006

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#121 » by 667Club » Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:54 am

Paydro70 wrote:Who's been guarding Rose tonight? Can this be attributed to Felton, or is Rose just missing his layups this game?


I think Okafor played a important role in Rose's poor game but it really was a team work not letting him an easy way to the basket.

Also i want to say that this win is not the result of a particuly poor play from the bulls playting to the level of their opponent according to the bulls commentators :roll: As if Derrick Rose had a terrible showing (worst game of his young carreer) Gordon and Deng couldn't miss a jumpshot from anywhere on the court.
User avatar
e4Nf6
Starter
Posts: 2,046
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 11, 2007

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#122 » by e4Nf6 » Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:59 am

Refs/homeriffic announcers made watching this game tough at times. Is it too much to ask an NBA announcer to follow the NBA and be at least vaguely familiar with the sport? Also, Bad calls on both sides all game. Almost fell out of my chair at the mention of "Big Shot" Larry Hughes.

Very interesting to me that LB left in DJ and Matt Carrol in very "Defensive" dead-ball situations. Maybe he doesn't want to put a cold player in, maybe he felt DJ was too important to take out under any circumstances.

Rose looked unsure towards the end, he had a big strength advantage and is probably just as fast as DJ, but he didn't look confident at all. Unfortunately that's the kind of thing that gets fixed eventually and I think we'll be dealing with him for 10 years....

Our offense should be run through DJ/Diaw from now on, I want to see the ball in Felton's hands less, especially at the end of the game. If DJ has one of his bad games we need to just ride it out, they will come less and less with time. Most NBA 4s are going to be a fish out of water chasing Diaw around the perimeter, and he doesn't look bad guarding them in the post or rebounding. Leave him at PF and don't trade Crash please.

Hopefully this win breaks the seal and we can make a little run...
=/∞
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#123 » by BigSlam » Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:01 am

Rose shot poorly and didn't impose his will, but he did still have 5 boards and 7 assists!!
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
SamBone
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,477
And1: 4
Joined: Feb 06, 2006

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#124 » by SamBone » Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:14 am

Great game tonight. Both DJ and Ray outplayed Rose, but it was only one game. I am starting to love DJ but Rose is really good. I think we played great "TEAM" ball tonight. It will be curious to see how that carries into games when Crash is back.

I didn't mind the Bulls announcers as much as most of you did. All team announcers are homers, nobody annoys me more then Henry and his stories about when he played. The dude acts like he was Micheal Jordan or a better shooter the Reggie Miller. So any announcer is refreshing to listen to other then our announcers. The only announcers that bother me are the morons that still call us the Hornets

But I do LOVE Steph!
2012 GMAT Christmas Edition : OKC Thunder

PG: DWill / Bayless
SG: DWade / VC / Grant Hill
SF: KD / MWP
PF: Ibaka / Landry
C : DMC / Dalembert / Kelly Olynyk

draft rites to Serey Karaey
H00PSTER
Ballboy
Posts: 16
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 01, 2008

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#125 » by H00PSTER » Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:17 am

Wow, as a Bulls fan, that game sucked. But let me mention a few things, I was very impressed with DJ Augustin. He is going to be a great player in this league (especially if he can act like that). :lol: But in all seriousness, he's a great basketball player. And also Emeka Okafor ate Derrick Rose's lunch, that was by far Derrick's worst game of the season. Good performance by the Cats tonight.
GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#126 » by GswStorm3 » Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:14 am

Those Bulls broadcasters are such blind homers. How the hell did you not see Derrick Rose hit Augustin on the wrist on three separate replays. That was a good call.

Even more comical they said Augustine shouldn't get that call because he's a rookie.
Walt Cronkite
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,901
And1: 1,131
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Raleigh
 

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#127 » by Walt Cronkite » Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:40 am

i mean, I thought it was a bad call, but Charlotte was without it's best player and I didn't hear that mentioned once.
MAQ
RealGM
Posts: 45,829
And1: 2,997
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Location: Dedication
     

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#128 » by MAQ » Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:14 am

Walt Cronkite wrote:i mean, I thought it was a bad call, but Charlotte was without it's best player and I didn't hear that mentioned once.

it was mentioned 3 times...only in the form of "the bulls need to beat this bobcats team that is missing it's best player"
GYBE wrote:I don't think my behaviour changes at all when I'm drunk. But when I'm wasted, my girlfriend becomes a real klutz. She starts walking into doors and falling down stairs. Weird.
Walt Cronkite
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,901
And1: 1,131
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Raleigh
 

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#129 » by Walt Cronkite » Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:50 pm

I watched via the internet. Not a recipe for super reliable audio. All I heard was them saying we were bad--a bad offensive team and a bad defensive team...which hopefully stung on the flight out.
User avatar
e4Nf6
Starter
Posts: 2,046
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 11, 2007

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#130 » by e4Nf6 » Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:55 pm

Walt Cronkite wrote:I watched via the internet. Not a recipe for super reliable audio. All I heard was them saying we were bad--a bad offensive team and a bad defensive team...which hopefully stung on the flight out.


"They're a bad defensive team"
"You would expect to win by 20"

etc.

Probably because the Bobcat's don't have one of the 10 or 15 Non-Bull NBA-players that he's heard of. I don't mind him saying we are bad on offense, it's true. But the defense has always been solid. Incidentally the Cats are 14th in defensive efficiency and have been as high as 9th (I believe...) while the Bulls sit at 16th. However, I wouldn't expect a honest=to-goodness professional broadcaster to invest the same 10 seconds that I did to look that up.
=/∞
User avatar
Paydro70
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,805
And1: 225
Joined: Mar 23, 2007

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#131 » by Paydro70 » Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:23 pm

Or to know what defensive efficiency is. They'd probably just look at PPG and say we're awesome.
Image
User avatar
Concept Coop
Analyst
Posts: 3,040
And1: 608
Joined: Jul 21, 2008

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#132 » by Concept Coop » Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:30 pm

Night Angel 1 wrote:Those Bulls broadcasters are such blind homers. How the hell did you not see Derrick Rose hit Augustin on the wrist on three separate replays. That was a good call.

Even more comical they said Augustine shouldn't get that call because he's a rookie.


Yeah...the broadcasters were homers. :lol: :roll:

Although the game should have been over after the blown call, the Cats outplayed the Bulls for most of the game. As Bulls fans, we can complain about the call, but there was still overtime.
Real GM Bulls Board: Step 2 - Anger
Walt Cronkite
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,901
And1: 1,131
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Raleigh
 

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#133 » by Walt Cronkite » Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:59 pm

I expect the Chicago Sports Net announcers to homeout for the Bulls. They have plenty of time to look at some stats about the away team though, so their apparent vast ignorance is pretty unacceptable. Not as bad as the C's though. :D

I hate it when fans complain about bad calls. You have to expect it and win despite them. Again, Charlotte was without it's best player who was missing time because of his father's death. He has hardly played hoops in 2 weeks because he missed games before that due to his grandmother's death. So one place that the homer announcers and I can agree is that the Bulls should've blown us out by 20. They took the game lightly. No more excuses.
User avatar
SteveMorrison15
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,430
And1: 60
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Location: Orlando

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#134 » by SteveMorrison15 » Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:31 am

Concept Coop is my favorite poster on RGM. He killed it in the "Rondo the next Kidd" thread on GB
User avatar
e4Nf6
Starter
Posts: 2,046
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 11, 2007

Re: GT: Charlotte v. Chicago 7:00pm 

Post#135 » by e4Nf6 » Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:07 pm

So much talk about the "blown call," and nothing about the obvious goal tend just before. Or throwing Bell out for nothing. The refs were bad both ways.

Incidentally I´m not completely sure that it wasn´t a foul on Rose. If he touches his arm at all it´s a foul, and I believe he did touch it on the way up.
=/∞

Return to Charlotte Hornets