Bulls and Kings Deal

ohara · Post #1 » by **ohara** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:29 pm

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3916703

In my opinion, the Bulls just got a lot better. Solid big man and a young scorer. Bulls fans should be happy. I also think this kills our hopes for the 8th spot. Chicago has more talent than us now and we would have to beat them out for the 8th spot. Not happening this year.

Felton for Pres · Post #2 » by **Felton for Pres** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:54 pm

ILBIT

W_HAMILTON · Post #3 » by **W_HAMILTON** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:02 pm

ILBIT isn't defined by www.urbandictionary.com yet so ???

Post #4 » by **BigSlam** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:20 pm

Pretty much spells the end of Ben Gordon there - right?

Post #5 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:58 pm

W_HAMILTON wrote:ILBIT isn't defined by http://www.urbandictionary.com yet so ???

I was stunned that BBBBBBBK hadn't been defined, either.

Post #6 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:00 am

BigSlam wrote:Pretty much spells the end of Ben Gordon there - right?

He should take OKC's money and run.

Westbrook-Gordon-The Durantchula-Green-Chandler + their lottery pick..imagine if it was Griffin!

doc.end · Post #7 » by **doc.end** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:21 pm

Walt Cronkite wrote:
BigSlam wrote:Pretty much spells the end of Ben Gordon there - right?

He should take OKC's money and run.

Westbrook-Gordon-The Durantchula-Green-Chandler + their lottery pick..imagine if it was Griffin!

But no more Chandler there - they rescinded the trade after physicals.

e4Nf6 · Post #8 » by **e4Nf6** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:41 pm

Ugh...Not loooking good for us. The Bulls just got a bit better.

I understand Gooden for Miller but Salmons for Noc is puzzling. Its just a downgrade and I dont believe they`re really saving any money there. I can`t believe the kings couldnt have done better with Salmons than that.

Post #9 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:19 pm

e4Nf6 wrote:Ugh...Not loooking good for us. The Bulls just got a bit better.

I understand Gooden for Miller but Salmons for Noc is puzzling. Its just a downgrade and I dont believe they`re really saving any money there. I can`t believe the kings couldnt have done better with Salmons than that.

Yea, this was a weird trade. Salmons is actually more $$$ than Nocioni right now since he had around a 2m trade kicker.

chrbal · Post #10 » by **chrbal** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:33 pm

For the Kings it kind of seems like they gave up and just took that deal. Teams are too in love with the "descending" contracts.

Ike Diogu for Michael Ruffin. My god has he fallen off.