ImageImage

BFHOS - NIC BATUM?

Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben

yes or no?

yes
24
96%
no
1
4%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
luciano-davidwesley
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,954
And1: 2,694
Joined: Aug 03, 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:
   

Re: BFHOS - NIC BATUM? 

Post#21 » by luciano-davidwesley » Wed Mar 23, 2022 9:51 pm

If I was coach/GM I would have told him he would be enjoying a year as a cheerleader with 0 playing time at all if he didn't decline the team option or negotiate a massive buyout. I would have punked him for a year just to make sure the screwing over of parties was mutual. As it was Kupchak did literally the best thing possible for Batum in waiving and stretching him.

I would have taken satisfaction in watching SRP's and G-Leaguers on 10 day contracts taking his PT for a year and hurting his future value. Knowing that we would have a massive salary cap clean when he came off the books next season instead of a 3 year stretch. We might have even got some minor draft capital for his expiring deal at the trade deadline.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: BFHOS - NIC BATUM? 

Post#22 » by BigSlam » Wed Mar 23, 2022 9:55 pm

luciano-davidwesley wrote:If I was coach/GM I would have told him he would be enjoying a year as a cheerleader with 0 playing time at all if he didn't decline the team option or negotiate a massive buyout. I would have punked him for a year just to make sure the screwing over of parties was mutual. As it was Kupchak did literally the best thing possible for Batum in waiving and stretching him.

I would have taken satisfaction in watching SRP's and G-Leaguers on 10 day contracts taking his PT for a year and hurting his future value. Knowing that we would have a massive salary cap clean when he came off the books next season instead of a 3 year stretch. We might have even got some minor draft capital for his expiring deal at the trade deadline.

I get wanting to be petty, but all that might do is dissuade future FA’s from wanting to sign here.
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
luciano-davidwesley
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,954
And1: 2,694
Joined: Aug 03, 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:
   

Re: BFHOS - NIC BATUM? 

Post#23 » by luciano-davidwesley » Wed Mar 23, 2022 10:06 pm

BigSlam wrote:
luciano-davidwesley wrote:If I was coach/GM I would have told him he would be enjoying a year as a cheerleader with 0 playing time at all if he didn't decline the team option or negotiate a massive buyout. I would have punked him for a year just to make sure the screwing over of parties was mutual. As it was Kupchak did literally the best thing possible for Batum in waiving and stretching him.

I would have taken satisfaction in watching SRP's and G-Leaguers on 10 day contracts taking his PT for a year and hurting his future value. Knowing that we would have a massive salary cap clean when he came off the books next season instead of a 3 year stretch. We might have even got some minor draft capital for his expiring deal at the trade deadline.

I get wanting to be petty, but all that might do is dissuade future FA’s from wanting to sign here.

I agree that is possible. Not that many decent FA's sign here anyway! :lol:
I'd hope any FA worth his salt is probably not worrying about how he will react to a team calling him out on mailing it in though.

The Batum treatment would only apply to a player not putting in effort and taking the bag. And a player worried about that might be doing us a favour by not signing.

Return to Charlotte Hornets