vexco wrote:BigSlam wrote:vexco wrote:Kemba was an inefficient chucker his first 4 seasons as well. 19 million is a bit much but it's not really that big of a deal as long as we can still use the MLE. It's money we weren't going to be able to use to sign anyone anyway considering we were over the cap. I'm just hoping there's a pick coming back.
Then why not save the $19 mil per year and 4 year commitment and let next season ride with Devonte running the point?
3 years, right? My point is that it's not hurting us cap-wise to get him in a S&T. It's dead money. If it works out, great. If it doesn't work out, we move on around the same time our other big contracts expire. I just don't see the issue. Rozier is a talented player.
Sorry, my bad. I wrote 4 and corrected it to 3 - but must have done that after you quoted me.
I don't know man - I didn't want Rozier at all, but like others Rozier at 3/$30-$36mil would have been easier to swallow than Rozier at 3/$60mil.
It just feels like yet another anchor contract to go with all of the other anchor contracts we already have and were hoping to get out of in the next 12=24 months.
And again, I'd MUCH rather see what we have in Devonte. And I worry the young guys wont get their shots with Rozier running the show.
The whole thing just smacks of a desperation move to me, like the FO said "oh crap, we lost Kemba. We better get something to show for it. Something. Anything" then lunged at this.
I hope you are right though. I hope Rozier is WAY better than a lot of us think and he proves us all wrong and develops into a valuable asset (that we actually capitalize on).