ImageImage

The Nik Stauskas Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#121 » by catch20two » Sat May 24, 2014 2:59 am

BigSlam wrote:
catch20two wrote:
jdm3 wrote:The problem is where Young's ceiling is say an 8.5 and Nik's is 8 the floors are 5 and 7 respectively. Nik is going to be a player in the league for a decade because of all his skills. Young will not last that long unless he develops the basketball skills to last. Young has gotten by on size and athletic ability where Nik has worked on the craft. I won't mind Young at 9 but I think Nik is the better pick because we know he is a player and if they both max out the difference isn't even that much.

Lol. Y'all act like Young can't shoot as if he on some MKG sh*t. Young is a legit deep threat. He has similar numbers to Michael Redd coming out of college.

Redd was known as a defensive specialist coming out of college - not a marksman.

I can't remember a day in my life when Michael Redd was considered good at defense and especially not in college. I remember watching the Scoonie Penn years. His jumper was inconsistent coming out of college so you're right that he wasn't necessarily a marksman and that's why he fell to the 2nd round. That's how I remember it.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#122 » by Eoghan » Sat May 24, 2014 3:01 am

DY_nasty wrote:^Probably
BrotherDave wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
Think the Suns would be interested in trading 14 and 18 for 9?

Maybe? They need a big talent injection to get over the hump and into the WC playoff picture.

What?

They just needed Eric Bledsoe to play. And if they get more continuity between their young guys - which they no doubt can with their outstanding coach - they'll be just fine. And they've got LA's pick next year too. If anything, they'll be looking to move out of the draft for veteran players who can steady the boat and mentor.

Their best player is still Goran Dragic. He's a fine player but... he's Goran Dragic. The West is as competitive as ****.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#123 » by BigSlam » Sat May 24, 2014 3:33 am

InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.

Welcome to the board, but you might want to cool it with the insults.

Not the best way to endear yourself to posters.
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,767
And1: 16,749
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#124 » by Liver_Pooty » Sat May 24, 2014 3:38 am

BigSlam wrote:
InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.

Welcome to the board, but you might want to cool it with the insults.

Not the best way to endear yourself to posters.


I agree Problem, but listen to Slam.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#125 » by mrknowitall215 » Sat May 24, 2014 3:51 am

InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.


I can't recall anyone stating that Young is 'more' athletic than Stauskas in this thread. Is this a foresighted statement or just rhetorical for sake of saying it?
Image
InProblematique
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 48
Joined: May 23, 2014
         

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#126 » by InProblematique » Sat May 24, 2014 3:51 am

BigSlam wrote:
InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.

Welcome to the board, but you might want to cool it with the insults.

Not the best way to endear yourself to posters.

Didn't particularly come here to endear. I've seen way worse things said here. And if people think Young is actually more athletic than Staus, they need some tough love.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#127 » by BigSlam » Sat May 24, 2014 4:08 am

InProblematique wrote:
BigSlam wrote:
InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.

Welcome to the board, but you might want to cool it with the insults.

Not the best way to endear yourself to posters.

Didn't particularly come here to endear. I've seen way worse things said here. And if people think Young is actually more athletic than Staus, they need some tough love.

It's your second day at RGM and you have already revived a public warning.

How about you let me and the other mods handle dialing out the tough love?

Thanks.
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#128 » by BigSlam » Sat May 24, 2014 4:09 am

Back on track and discussing Nik Stauskas thanks.
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
BlackOutBuzz
Hornets Forum Capologist
Posts: 7,795
And1: 3,004
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
Location: Burlington, NC
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#129 » by BlackOutBuzz » Sat May 24, 2014 4:19 am

Image
Hornets Picks by Year
2021: Bouknight, Jones, Thor, Lewis

Protection on future 1st* (to NYK); 2nds
2022: 1-18; CHA (31-55), TOR 2 (55-60)
2023: 1-16; BOS (GH)
2024: 1-14; BOS (GH)
2025: 1-14; CHA (31-55)
*Becomes two 2nds if unconveyed
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,767
And1: 16,749
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#130 » by Liver_Pooty » Sat May 24, 2014 4:30 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:
InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.


I can't recall anyone stating that Young is 'more' athletic than Stauskas in this thread. Is this a foresighted statement or just rhetorical for sake of saying it?


I think hes close or on par. More athletic is a reach.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
W_HAMILTON
RealGM
Posts: 17,453
And1: 16,996
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
 

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#131 » by W_HAMILTON » Sat May 24, 2014 5:37 am

I think this guy is my preliminary choice for #9.

Even though it's tough, because I'm almost sure one of the top choices will fall (it sounds like Randle), in which case, I think we should take advantage of that. I wish we could draft whichever big name drops to #9 and use the #24 and whatever else to move up and draft Stauskas.

PS - I think this is the first white guy I've ever advocated drafting in my ~22 years of watching the NBA!
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#132 » by MasterIchiro » Sat May 24, 2014 2:11 pm

Enjoy the ride!

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhdryFLnaok[/youtube]
It has been written...
User avatar
Joest2003
Analyst
Posts: 3,233
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 19, 2013
Location: Hartford, CT
   

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#133 » by Joest2003 » Sat May 24, 2014 2:37 pm

InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlARGQ1yrW0

just stop...please
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#134 » by DY_nasty » Sat May 24, 2014 3:03 pm

Joest2003 wrote:
InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlARGQ1yrW0

just stop...please

That's nice and all but we've all watched a top-level athlete waste all of his abilities for the majority of the season because of a lack of an off-hand and limited offensive game.

I'd rather see a guy who knows how to use his athleticism over a guy who can run in a straight line and go for dunks only when defenses allow a running start.
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#135 » by BeesWax » Sat May 24, 2014 3:28 pm

Joest2003 wrote:
InProblematique wrote:Also, lol at anyone who's saying Young is more athletic than Stauskas. Idiots.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlARGQ1yrW0

just stop...please

Watch the video above your post. Young is stronger right now but not really more athletic. Both can elevate one is strong the other more skilled. I think it is easier to put a guy in the weight room than teach him to use his off hand and shoot better and see the court better.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#136 » by MasterIchiro » Sat May 24, 2014 3:32 pm

Image

Looks pretty athletic to me. I don't know what standards you guys have with your fish sticks.
It has been written...
KembaWalker
RealGM
Posts: 11,955
And1: 13,582
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#137 » by KembaWalker » Sat May 24, 2014 3:54 pm

I definitely prefer Stauskas overall game over James Young mediocre scoring potential. elite shooting 2 guard that can also create for others is pretty much exactly the opposite of Henderson, which is exactly what we need imo
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,767
And1: 16,749
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#138 » by Liver_Pooty » Sat May 24, 2014 4:32 pm

I have a feeling that if Stauskas wasn't a white Canadian that no one would be harping on his athleticism.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#139 » by catch20two » Sat May 24, 2014 5:15 pm

Liver_Pooty wrote:I have a feeling that if Stauskas wasn't a white Canadian that no one would be harping on his athleticism.

Stauskas has good athleticism. Nobody should be harping on that.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: The Nik Stauskas Thread 

Post#140 » by mrknowitall215 » Sat May 24, 2014 10:52 pm

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXsnoYAYJHU[/youtube]
Image

Return to Charlotte Hornets