JMAC3 wrote:JustBuzzin wrote:JMAC3 wrote:I love scrolling twitter and seeing all the fans saying trade LaMelo because they are tired of this... as if the team doesn't get significantly worse overnight if we make that deal. Anyone who thinks we trade LaMelo and are a better team in the next 24 months is fully delusional.
Not saying eventually after multiple lottery's we couldn't improve but if the goal is to see a better product on the floor then that is broken logic.
We haven't won with LaMelo either lol
Also who said we will be better trading LaMelo?
The goal would be developing our young rookies and preparing to add another core piece in a loaded draft.
I'm personally tired of playing the waiting game with LaMelo. We don't win much even if he plays. We don't gain anything by keeping him. In fact the longer we keep the more likely he's going to be forced to stay here because if he keeps getting injured with that massive contract nobody is going to touch him.
So we can keep him and play the injury game yet again. Just know that's a dangerous game long-term.
Yeah, just don't think it is some problem solving move that many fans assume it will be. We will be a worse team after the trade, anyone who thinks we are getting Trae, Morant or Garland back in a LaMelo trade are delusional.
It will be a bunch of mediocre picks likely a few years into the future, so the team will suck for at least 2 more years.
Im not arguing we are good now, just think the move will make us worse. If everyone is willing to accept that then sure let's make the trade. Just knowing this fanbase they will just want to panic trade the next guy when we aren't winning and Miller will be the next guy that fans turn on that we have to trade because the team isn't good.
We are going to suck anyway because Ball plays like 50% of the games in a season and that was before he was publicly disatisfied. I'm just wondering what we could fleece a desperate Pels or Kings franchise for.

























