Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben
SeanBobcats wrote:What if we got Zach Lavine and Julius Randle. I highly doubt it, but that might be our best outcome possible. I think both are future stars.
Snidely FC wrote:
Who would you most enjoy watching be a Hornet?
Snidely FC wrote: Who would you most enjoy watching be a Hornet?
SeanBobcats wrote:What if we got Zach Lavine and Julius Randle. I highly doubt it, but that might be our best outcome possible. I think both are future stars.
MasterIchiro wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:What if we got Zach Lavine and Julius Randle. I highly doubt it, but that might be our best outcome possible. I think both are future stars.
Say we draft 7 and DET pick is 9 or 10.
We trade 7 and POR for Randle and use the DET pick to draft LaVine.
That's what I want.
SeanBobcats wrote:What if we got Zach Lavine and Julius Randle. I highly doubt it, but that might be our best outcome possible. I think both are future stars.
BigSlam wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:What if we got Zach Lavine and Julius Randle. I highly doubt it, but that might be our best outcome possible. I think both are future stars.
Best possible would be Embiid and Parker IMO - but HIGHLY unrealistic of course.
Embiid and Lavine would be pretty sweet.
MasterIchiro wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:What if we got Zach Lavine and Julius Randle. I highly doubt it, but that might be our best outcome possible. I think both are future stars.
And I agree with you. I'd rather have 2 stars from this draft than just 1 superstar. You put 2 stars together with Kemba and I think 3 stars gives you a title contender.
Our role players like MKG, Biz and Zeller would need to develop though and make us deep... I think they can over these next couple years.
SeanBobcats wrote:MasterIchiro wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:What if we got Zach Lavine and Julius Randle. I highly doubt it, but that might be our best outcome possible. I think both are future stars.
And I agree with you. I'd rather have 2 stars from this draft than just 1 superstar. You put 2 stars together with Kemba and I think 3 stars gives you a title contender.
Our role players like MKG, Biz and Zeller would need to develop though and make us deep... I think they can over these next couple years.
Yeah, that would really be an awesome core
PG- Kemba/Sessions (re-sign him)
SG- Lavine/Henderson
SF- MKG/Taylor
PF- Randle/Zeller
C- Jefferson/Biz
Looks awesome. I think MKG could still eventually develop into a Gerald Wallace type player too.
MasterIchiro wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:MasterIchiro wrote:
And I agree with you. I'd rather have 2 stars from this draft than just 1 superstar. You put 2 stars together with Kemba and I think 3 stars gives you a title contender.
Our role players like MKG, Biz and Zeller would need to develop though and make us deep... I think they can over these next couple years.
Yeah, that would really be an awesome core
PG- Kemba/Sessions (re-sign him)
SG- Lavine/Henderson
SF- MKG/Taylor
PF- Randle/Zeller
C- Jefferson/Biz
Looks awesome. I think MKG could still eventually develop into a Gerald Wallace type player too.
I would say even bring in Evan Turner for 3 years while MKG develops into an impact two-way player.
PG-Kemba/Sessions
SG-LaVine/Henderson
SF-Turner/MKG
PF-Randle/Zeller
C-Jefferson/Biz
SeanBobcats wrote:MasterIchiro wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:Yeah, that would really be an awesome core
PG- Kemba/Sessions (re-sign him)
SG- Lavine/Henderson
SF- MKG/Taylor
PF- Randle/Zeller
C- Jefferson/Biz
Looks awesome. I think MKG could still eventually develop into a Gerald Wallace type player too.
I would say even bring in Evan Turner for 3 years while MKG develops into an impact two-way player.
PG-Kemba/Sessions
SG-LaVine/Henderson
SF-Turner/MKG
PF-Randle/Zeller
C-Jefferson/Biz
I'm personally not extremely high on Turner. I think MKG will be developed best with more minutes. Turner is a solid player but is an inefficient scorer and turns the ball over a lot. I think we'd have to overpay to get him. If were going to sign a SF in the FA, I'd prefer a guy like Luol Deng, a veteran who can help develop our core and play good basketball at the same time
SeanBobcats wrote:BigSlam wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:What if we got Zach Lavine and Julius Randle. I highly doubt it, but that might be our best outcome possible. I think both are future stars.
Best possible would be Embiid and Parker IMO - but HIGHLY unrealistic of course.
Embiid and Lavine would be pretty sweet.
Be realistic though Embiid AND Parker. That's two top three picks. We'd be extremely lucky just to get one top 3 pick. Randle and lavine are two guys that could go outside the top 5 very easily. There's still a big chance we don't have two top 10 picks.
BigSlam wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:BigSlam wrote:Best possible would be Embiid and Parker IMO - but HIGHLY unrealistic of course.
Embiid and Lavine would be pretty sweet.
Be realistic though Embiid AND Parker. That's two top three picks. We'd be extremely lucky just to get one top 3 pick. Randle and lavine are two guys that could go outside the top 5 very easily. There's still a big chance we don't have two top 10 picks.
Did you not read my post?
SeanBobcats wrote:BigSlam wrote:SeanBobcats wrote:Be realistic though Embiid AND Parker. That's two top three picks. We'd be extremely lucky just to get one top 3 pick. Randle and lavine are two guys that could go outside the top 5 very easily. There's still a big chance we don't have two top 10 picks.
Did you not read my post?
Yes I did lol, but I'm just saying the best thing that is probably possible would be lavine and randle. Do you like that duo?
thruthefire wrote:LaVine won't be ready to contribute as a rookie, if he declares this year.
