Off Topic V

Liver_Pooty · Post #1361 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:51 pm

serengeti wrote:Cuestion:

In Charlotte, for the Bobcats fans, wich College is more supported in NCAA: Duke or UNC?

Probably UNC. Im a huge Duke fan, and we are hated just about everywhere.

Liver_Pooty · Post #1362 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:03 am

Jameis Winston is being investigated for sexual battery from back in 2012.

Post #1363 » by **JDR720** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:39 pm

yea probably UNC is more liked that Duke

1-UNC
2-Duke
3-NC State/Clemson
4-Universities like Wake Forest
5-Small universities/colleges such as UNC Charlotte

Post #1364 » by **JDR720** » Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:41 pm

Liver_Pooty wrote:Jameis Winston is being investigated for sexual battery from back in 2012.

He tried to use his Famous Jameis in illegal ways

HornetJail · Post #1365 » by **HornetJail** » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:41 am

JDR720 wrote:yea probably UNC is more liked that Duke

1-UNC
2-Duke
3-NC State/USC
4-Universities like Wake Forest
5-Small universities/colleges such as UNC Charlotte

fixed

Liver_Pooty · Post #1366 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:04 am

Biz Gilwalker wrote:
JDR720 wrote:yea probably UNC is more liked that Duke

1-UNC
2-Duke
3-NC State/USC
4-Universities like Wake Forest
5-Small universities/colleges such as UNC Charlotte

fixed

People still like Wake Forest? Talk about a school in the dump right now. Same for State.

Post #1367 » by **JDR720** » Sat Nov 16, 2013 10:12 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/rick_bonnell/status/401833416556937216[/tweet]

If i had to guess i'd say a scout

Liver_Pooty · Post #1368 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 12:03 am

So happy for David Cutliffe and the Duke football program.

Post #1369 » by **JDR720** » Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:00 am

Its official the Panthers are legit

Liver_Pooty · Post #1370 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:15 am

JDR720 wrote:Its official the Panthers are legit

What a game.

Post #1371 » by **JDR720** » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:27 pm

Liver_Pooty wrote:
JDR720 wrote:Its official the Panthers are legit

What a game.

i almost had a heart attack when the ref threw that flag in the RZ

Post #1372 » by **JDR720** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:40 am

http://bringbackthebuzz.wordpress.com/2 ... cats-fans/

HornetJail · Post #1373 » by **HornetJail** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:35 am

I literally fell off my couch and kept my face on the carpet for about a minute after that flag was thrown, knowing the Patriots would score on the ensuing final play (thankfully that play never occured). What a game.

W_HAMILTON · Post #1374 » by **W_HAMILTON** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:19 am

Can someone explain how that flag in the Panthers / Patriots game could have been "called back?" I'm pretty sure I've seen interceptions overturned because there was pass interference / illegal contact (not sure if that's what it is called) on a receiver away from where the ball was being thrown.

BlackOutBuzz · Post #1375 » by **BlackOutBuzz** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:02 am

The flag was originally thrown because the ref made a reactionary judgement call when he saw Kuech all over Gronk. However, the refs determined that Brady's short throw, coupled with Gronk's momentum toward the back of the end-zone (the opposite direction of the ball), made the pass "uncatchable," and thus, the play not subject to an interference call.

Now, whether it truly was uncatchable is a whole other argument, but I'm happy to be on the winning side of one of these iffy calls.

Liver_Pooty · Post #1376 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:55 am

If Gronkowski would have atleast acted like he wanted to catch the ball it could have been a different story. He acted like he was the ball was short, and back pedaled on his own.

Post #1377 » by **JDR720** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:20 pm

Sports Science (ESPN thing) did a test on that call, they figured out that Gronk could've gotten that pass but was extremely unlikely, so they got the call right basically uncatchable, only reason people are even making this a big deal is because the ref threw the flag then picked it up...and its the Pats

the pass was 6yds in front of Gronk and about 4ft off the ground, he would've literally had to shove Luke out of the way (offensive pass interference?) lunged forward a few feet get full extension and grab the ball inches off the ground and also get there before Lester INT's it, and Luke grabbed him .667 seconds before Lester INT'ed the ball, so he would've had about 2 seconds ( w/o Luke messing with him) to get that ball before Lester got it or it hit the ground, which is basically impossible

Post #1378 » by **JDR720** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:35 pm

How about that Cam Newton run? he broke the whole defenses ankles, best run by a QB in years probably

Post #1379 » by **JDR720** » Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:36 pm

W_HAMILTON · Post #1380 » by **W_HAMILTON** » Thu Nov 21, 2013 5:46 am

I still don't understand the call, given calls I've seen in other games. I know that I've seen calls where there was a similar scuffle on one side of the field, the ball was thrown to the other side and intercepted, and the call was overturn because of a flag being called on the scuffle, well away from where the ball was thrown. Are you saying that the Patriots were essentially penalized for throwing TO Gronkowski in the midst of that scuffle? If the ball had been thrown to another receiver and there was that sort of contact with Gronkowski and the defender, would it not have been correct to throw a flag in that situation due to the contact?