Fake Trade Thread 2014-15

Radu_Hornets · Post #141 » by **Radu_Hornets** » Mon May 26, 2014 7:43 pm

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1323920

Just started this thread

Sonrisen · Post #142 » by **Sonrisen** » Mon May 26, 2014 10:43 pm

jdm3 wrote:
Sonrisen wrote:Trade 1:
Hendo to Knicks for THJ and Fatty

Trade 2:
MKG, Biz, Zeller and Detroits 1st to Bulls for Noah and the Hornets pick back

Trade 3:
Kemba to Orlando for Tobias Harris and Etwuan Moore

FA signing:
Kyle Lowry to big time deal
Chris Kaman

Draft Napier with Hornets pick
Draft Hairston with Portland pick

New Lineup:
PG: Lowry, Napier, Fatty
SG: THJ, Hairston, CDR
SF: Harris, Viking, Tolliver
PF: Big Al, McBob
C: Noah, Kaman

So we downgrade our SG, if we took Nik or Young, SF, and get two players who can't play together in Noah and Al. PG is a wash due to age and contract differences. What a step backwards here.

Welcome to the board but this is terrible.

I don't think THJ is a downgrade from Hendo, and I think Al and Noah are ideal together; one is bad one defense regardless if he's a c or pf, yet is an amazing low post scorer and more than adequate rebounder, the other is an amazing rebounder, defender and assist man for a big and doesn't look for his opwn shot; perfect compliments to one another. We'll just have to agree to disagree about our fake trades.

BeesWax · Post #143 » by **BeesWax** » Mon May 26, 2014 11:16 pm

Sonrisen wrote:
jdm3 wrote:
Sonrisen wrote:Trade 1:
Hendo to Knicks for THJ and Fatty

Trade 2:
MKG, Biz, Zeller and Detroits 1st to Bulls for Noah and the Hornets pick back

Trade 3:
Kemba to Orlando for Tobias Harris and Etwuan Moore

FA signing:
Kyle Lowry to big time deal
Chris Kaman

Draft Napier with Hornets pick
Draft Hairston with Portland pick

New Lineup:
PG: Lowry, Napier, Fatty
SG: THJ, Hairston, CDR
SF: Harris, Viking, Tolliver
PF: Big Al, McBob
C: Noah, Kaman

So we downgrade our SG, if we took Nik or Young, SF, and get two players who can't play together in Noah and Al. PG is a wash due to age and contract differences. What a step backwards here.

Welcome to the board but this is terrible.

I don't think THJ is a downgrade from Hendo, and I think Al and Noah are ideal together; one is bad one defense regardless if he's a c or pf, yet is an amazing low post scorer and more than adequate rebounder, the other is an amazing rebounder, defender and assist man for a big and doesn't look for his opwn shot; perfect compliments to one another. We'll just have to agree to disagree about our fake trades.

The question isn't if THJ is better than Henderson it is that he is worse than who we should take at 9. Al is a bad defender at C but he would be the worst guy in the NBA at PF. No mobility. There is also no way our coach plays him and. Noah together with his inflexible lineups. I like the effort but it just isn't a very good outcome for what we lose.

Sonrisen · Post #144 » by **Sonrisen** » Mon May 26, 2014 11:19 pm

ok

jdm3 wrote:
Sonrisen wrote:
jdm3 wrote:So we downgrade our SG, if we took Nik or Young, SF, and get two players who can't play together in Noah and Al. PG is a wash due to age and contract differences. What a step backwards here.

Welcome to the board but this is terrible.

I don't think THJ is a downgrade from Hendo, and I think Al and Noah are ideal together; one is bad one defense regardless if he's a c or pf, yet is an amazing low post scorer and more than adequate rebounder, the other is an amazing rebounder, defender and assist man for a big and doesn't look for his opwn shot; perfect compliments to one another. We'll just have to agree to disagree about our fake trades.

The question isn't if THJ is better than Henderson it is that he is worse than who we should take at 9. Al is a bad defender at C but he would be the worst guy in the NBA at PF. No mobility. There is also no way our coach plays him and. Noah together with his inflexible lineups. I like the effort but it just isn't a very good outcome for what we lose.

HornetJail · Post #145 » by **HornetJail** » Tue May 27, 2014 2:29 am

Charlotte trades #9, #24, Zeller, Taylor, Henderson, 2015 1st for Irving
Cleveland trades Irving, Jack for #5, CHA 2015 1st, Taylor
Utah trades #5, for #9, #24, Zeller, Henderson, Jack
'
Is anybody opposed to this? I'm not the biggest Irving fan, but can you imagine a Kemba/Kyrie backcourt?

Al/Biz
McBob/Biz/MKG
MKG/Lance/CDR
Irving/Lance/CDR
Kemba/Irving

That would be stupidly awesome.

Loud_city · Post #146 » by **Loud_city** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:39 am

I have seen your board and I wonder. Why do so many people on here love Lamb? You guys like him better then Thunder fans.

BeesWax · Post #147 » by **BeesWax** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:43 am

Loud_city wrote:I have seen your board and I wonder. Why do so many people on here love Lamb? You guys like him better then Thunder fans.

With Kemba we inherited a lot of UConn fans.

ARHornet · Post #148 » by **ARHornet** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:43 am

Loud_city wrote:I have seen your board and I wonder. Why do so many people on here love Lamb? You guys like him better then Thunder fans.

Half of us love him and the other half are asking the same question you are.

Liver_Pooty · Post #149 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:44 am

Loud_city wrote:I have seen your board and I wonder. Why do so many people on here love Lamb? You guys like him better then Thunder fans.

I ask myself that every day.

Loud_city · Post #150 » by **Loud_city** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:46 am

There was someone on the Thudner Board saying if we would do Lamb for the 9 pick and that would be the most lopsided trade in years.

HornetJail · Post #151 » by **HornetJail** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:47 am

Loud_city wrote:I have seen your board and I wonder. Why do so many people on here love Lamb? You guys like him better then Thunder fans.

24 for lamb right now?

I probably wouldn't do Lamb for 9, but I see a ton of potential in him.

Liver_Pooty · Post #152 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:47 am

Loud_city wrote:There was someone on the Thudner Board saying if we would do Lamb for the 9 pick and that would be the most lopsided trade in years.

Lol i agree. Some on here think it would be a great deal for us though. :banghead:

Loud_city · Post #153 » by **Loud_city** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:49 am

Biz Gilwalker wrote:
Loud_city wrote:I have seen your board and I wonder. Why do so many people on here love Lamb? You guys like him better then Thunder fans.

24 for lamb right now?

I probably wouldn't do Lamb for 9, but I see a ton of potential in him.

Nope it was 9 straight up.

BeesWax · Post #154 » by **BeesWax** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:49 am

Loud_city wrote:There was someone on the Thudner Board saying if we would do Lamb for the 9 pick and that would be the most lopsided trade in years.

If they did that Cho would have already had a deal lined up to go back to OKC and this was an FU on the way out.

HornetJail · Post #155 » by **HornetJail** » Tue May 27, 2014 3:56 am

Loud_city wrote:
Biz Gilwalker wrote:
Loud_city wrote:I have seen your board and I wonder. Why do so many people on here love Lamb? You guys like him better then Thunder fans.

24 for lamb right now?

I probably wouldn't do Lamb for 9, but I see a ton of potential in him.

Nope it was 9 straight up.

yeah i know, but would OKC consider trading Lamb for 24 + something else?

Sonrisen · Post #156 » by **Sonrisen** » Tue May 27, 2014 4:03 am

Biz Gilwalker wrote:Charlotte trades #9, #24, Zeller, Taylor, Henderson, 2015 1st for Irving
Cleveland trades Irving, Jack for #5, CHA 2015 1st, Taylor
Utah trades #5, for #9, #24, Zeller, Henderson, Jack
'
Is anybody opposed to this? I'm not the biggest Irving fan, but can you imagine a Kemba/Kyrie backcourt?

Al/Biz
McBob/Biz/MKG
MKG/Lance/CDR
Irving/Lance/CDR
Kemba/Irving

That would be stupid.

Fixed for accuracy. Kyrie Irving is sooo overrated and has attitude problems. I wouldn't want his prima donna attitude anywhere near this team.

Loud_city · Post #157 » by **Loud_city** » Tue May 27, 2014 4:17 am

Biz Gilwalker wrote:
Loud_city wrote:
Biz Gilwalker wrote:24 for lamb right now?

I probably wouldn't do Lamb for 9, but I see a ton of potential in him.

Nope it was 9 straight up.

yeah i know, but would OKC consider trading Lamb for 24 + something else?

Probally would depend on what happens on draft night but I think they would do it.

ARHornet · Post #158 » by **ARHornet** » Tue May 27, 2014 4:20 am

While we are discussing OKC/CHA trades, do you think OKC would accept Gary Neal at 24 for 21?

HornetJail · Post #159 » by **HornetJail** » Tue May 27, 2014 4:26 am

Sonrisen wrote:
Biz Gilwalker wrote:Charlotte trades #9, #24, Zeller, Taylor, Henderson, 2015 1st for Irving
Cleveland trades Irving, Jack for #5, CHA 2015 1st, Taylor
Utah trades #5, for #9, #24, Zeller, Henderson, Jack
'
Is anybody opposed to this? I'm not the biggest Irving fan, but can you imagine a Kemba/Kyrie backcourt?

Al/Biz
McBob/Biz/MKG
MKG/Lance/CDR
Irving/Lance/CDR
Kemba/Irving

That would be stupid.

Fixed for accuracy. Kyrie Irving is sooo overrated and has attitude problems. I wouldn't want his prima donna attitude anywhere near this team.

I think being anywhere other than Cleveland could only help him.

Loud_city · Post #160 » by **Loud_city** » Tue May 27, 2014 4:28 am

ARHornet wrote:While we are discussing OKC/CHA trades, do you think OKC would accept Gary Neal at 24 for 21?

Don't you guys hate Neal? :lol: