ImageImage

Rookie of the Year: The Marco Belinelli Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#141 » by BigSlam » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:22 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
JDR720 wrote:what more could there be though?

Who knows, it's really odd. To me the big question is why does it need to be structured like this? Why not include all the pieces involved?

Doesn't Lamb have some sort of poison pill provision that prevents him from being traded until July or something?

I could be completely wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,478
And1: 15,678
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#142 » by yosemiteben » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:22 pm

JDR720 wrote:this probably is all the pieces involved. they view marco as a cheaper lee replacement and we know they liked him quite a bit from last offseason.

Definitely possible, but why earlier in the day were they trying to create space, only to a couple hours later take on salary?
Kembastockton
Hornets Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 2,310
And1: 56
Joined: Mar 09, 2011

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#143 » by Kembastockton » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:35 pm

There is more though towards the bottom of the page Cho says he is still in trade discussions he cannot discuss. Cho is not through. He can't draft worth much, but he can trade his back end off.



http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nba/charlotte-hornets/article85642502.html
Vanderbilt_Grad
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,025
And1: 1,781
Joined: Sep 22, 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#144 » by Vanderbilt_Grad » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:41 pm

The reason it couldn't go down last night was that it has to wait until Lamb's salary goes up or the Hornets clear space, neither of which will happen right away.
My picks:
2020 Draft (3rd pick) - Tyrese Haliburton, Devin Vassell, or Onyeka Okongwu
2021 Draft (11th pick) - Moses Moody
powerforward
Junior
Posts: 409
And1: 59
Joined: Nov 04, 2006

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#145 » by powerforward » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:44 pm

Well I think I am the only one that is ok with this trade, so I am probably wrong.
He is better than who we would have probably drafted at 22 but I am worried that this means no lee return.

Here is a highlight for him from last year, maybe we will see more of this instead of the rest of his season.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOQuRvlsMr0
User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,684
And1: 20,983
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#146 » by Diop » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:50 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
JDR720 wrote:this probably is all the pieces involved. they view marco as a cheaper lee replacement and we know they liked him quite a bit from last offseason.

Definitely possible, but why earlier in the day were they trying to create space, only to a couple hours later take on salary?

Couldn't create space, so gave up on Lee and replace him with cheaper Marco. Makes it easier to sign Lin and Marv?
Image
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,321
And1: 45,968
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#147 » by JDR720 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:51 pm

if we are trading Lamb + 22 for Marco, i dont see how that gets us anywhere. or the kings for that matter, they drafted Richardson who is basically Lamb 2.0 and have McLemore.

stats from last season.

Lamb-9/4/1 on 45/30/72
Marco- 10/2/2 on 38/30/83
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,478
And1: 15,678
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#148 » by yosemiteben » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:51 pm

Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:The reason it couldn't go down last night was that it has to wait until Lamb's salary goes up or the Hornets clear space, neither of which will happen right away.

Is that true? I thought you used average of current plus extension, which is right around $6M. Seems like it would have gone through.
Vanderbilt_Grad
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,025
And1: 1,781
Joined: Sep 22, 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#149 » by Vanderbilt_Grad » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:52 pm

I'm OK with this too. I'm not jumping for joy, but the move makes sense to me.

Lee has always been really unlikely to be back, and he's a guy I really like too. Lin is the one I worry about the most, in terms of being affected by this trade. I do think that the team will try Beli and Batum on the floor together.
My picks:
2020 Draft (3rd pick) - Tyrese Haliburton, Devin Vassell, or Onyeka Okongwu
2021 Draft (11th pick) - Moses Moody
predators
Senior
Posts: 744
And1: 319
Joined: Jun 13, 2014
     

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#150 » by predators » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:53 pm

I can't help thinking we wanted to spend the #9 pick on stauskas a couple years ago and his ceiling is bellinelli.
powerforward
Junior
Posts: 409
And1: 59
Joined: Nov 04, 2006

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#151 » by powerforward » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:00 pm

I don't know how this helps bringing Lin back but it looks like it probably means no lee, but if we bring back batum, Lin and marvin I'm good with that.

Kemba/Lin
Batum/ Belinelli
MKG/ Batum/Belinelli
Marvin/Frank/MKG/Batum
Cody/ Frank/ Hopefully some rim defender
Vanderbilt_Grad
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,025
And1: 1,781
Joined: Sep 22, 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#152 » by Vanderbilt_Grad » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:20 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:The reason it couldn't go down last night was that it has to wait until Lamb's salary goes up or the Hornets clear space, neither of which will happen right away.

Is that true? I thought you used average of current plus extension, which is right around $6M. Seems like it would have gone through.

The Hornets are technically over the cap until they start renouncing folks due to all the cap holds. Until his salary actually goes up Lamb is technically a poison pill contract (#90 on the CBA FAQ). This mean that Charlotte would have treated Lamb's salary as roughly $3M in terms of what they sent out, but the Kings would have treated it as the average. The deal would still work from their side, but Charlotte wouldn't have opened enough space to take Beli back. After Lamb's salary officially goes up he's not a poison pill and the salaries match well for a trade.

I also take into account that the pre-draft rumors were Lamb + 22 for space. This was the next best thing for the Hornets, and likely means that Lin is gone.
My picks:
2020 Draft (3rd pick) - Tyrese Haliburton, Devin Vassell, or Onyeka Okongwu
2021 Draft (11th pick) - Moses Moody
LofJ
RealGM
Posts: 12,955
And1: 11,159
Joined: Mar 29, 2014
   

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#153 » by LofJ » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:32 pm

It's probably dumb but I'm going to hold out hope that we will receive a draft pack back. And if not that we should at the very least be moving a contract.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,478
And1: 15,678
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#154 » by yosemiteben » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:55 pm

Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:This mean that Charlotte would have treated Lamb's salary as roughly $3M in terms of what they sent out, but the Kings would have treated it as the average. The deal would still work from their side, but Charlotte wouldn't have opened enough space to take Beli back.

Ah, there we go.
User avatar
BlackOutBuzz
Hornets Forum Capologist
Posts: 7,795
And1: 3,004
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
Location: Burlington, NC
       

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#155 » by BlackOutBuzz » Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:39 pm

The Lamb contract is a great point that had slipped my mind. I suppose he COULD be a part 2 of this deal, but likely to a third team as I'm not sure Sacramento would want/need him.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Hornets Picks by Year
2021: Bouknight, Jones, Thor, Lewis

Protection on future 1st* (to NYK); 2nds
2022: 1-18; CHA (31-55), TOR 2 (55-60)
2023: 1-16; BOS (GH)
2024: 1-14; BOS (GH)
2025: 1-14; CHA (31-55)
*Becomes two 2nds if unconveyed
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#156 » by BigSlam » Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:53 pm

BigSlam wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:
JDR720 wrote:what more could there be though?

Who knows, it's really odd. To me the big question is why does it need to be structured like this? Why not include all the pieces involved?

Doesn't Lamb have some sort of poison pill provision that prevents him from being traded until July or something?

I could be completely wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
B B M F 'ers
Kembastockton
Hornets Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 2,310
And1: 56
Joined: Mar 09, 2011

Re: Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#157 » by Kembastockton » Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:56 pm

Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:
Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:The reason it couldn't go down last night was that it has to wait until Lamb's salary goes up or the Hornets clear space, neither of which will happen right away.

Is that true? I thought you used average of current plus extension, which is right around $6M. Seems like it would have gone through.

The Hornets are technically over the cap until they start renouncing folks due to all the cap holds. Until his salary actually goes up Lamb is technically a poison pill contract (#90 on the CBA FAQ). This mean that Charlotte would have treated Lamb's salary as roughly $3M in terms of what they sent out, but the Kings would have treated it as the average. The deal would still work from their side, but Charlotte wouldn't have opened enough space to take Beli back. After Lamb's salary officially goes up he's not a poison pill and the salaries match well for a trade.

I also take into account that the pre-draft rumors were Lamb + 22 for space. This was the next best thing for the Hornets, and likely means that Lin is gone.


Lin has already said that he wants to start. There is no realistic reason to expect him back.
User avatar
MKGsMotor
Senior
Posts: 628
And1: 207
Joined: Jun 29, 2012
   

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#158 » by MKGsMotor » Fri Jun 24, 2016 4:11 pm

Why in the hell is a contract that we just freaking signed 8 months ago now destroying our team. Does our front office not **** think
The Lamb flock's vision has come true.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,321
And1: 45,968
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#159 » by JDR720 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 4:23 pm

MKGsMotor wrote:Why in the hell is a contract that we just freaking signed 8 months ago now destroying our team. Does our front office not **** think

it shows how bad moves from one offseason can impact you for years.

this goes all the way back to the Lance/Hayward offseason.
User avatar
MKGsMotor
Senior
Posts: 628
And1: 207
Joined: Jun 29, 2012
   

Re: Hornets Trade #22 for Marco Belinelli 

Post#160 » by MKGsMotor » Fri Jun 24, 2016 4:26 pm

JDR720 wrote:
MKGsMotor wrote:Why in the hell is a contract that we just freaking signed 8 months ago now destroying our team. Does our front office not **** think

it shows how bad moves from one offseason can impact you for years.

this goes all the way back to the Lance/Hayward offseason.


Yea but that's just a history of bad moves. Signing lamb when we did was a separate bad move by itself. Not waiting to see who is on the board at 22 and Chu busting his nut early for Marco was a separate bad move
The Lamb flock's vision has come true.

Return to Charlotte Hornets