Post#1508 » by spaceballer » Wed Nov 1, 2017 2:08 pm
In addition to him not being as good as early expectations, you also have the fact that Orlando had a management change this year.
So the top-5 pick label doesn't hold as much weight nor give the benefit of the doubt in any edge cases to hold on longer for a roll of the dice, since the new Gm is not as invested in his predecessor's picks. He may not share his predecessor's vision and won't suffer reputation effects as much for the failure of a top-5 draft pick failure where the blame can be ascribed to the previous regime.
There are many cases of regime changes with new management coming in and cleaning house with a desire to make their own mark on the franchise and enact a their own vision. Happens with many franchises and even organizations outside basketball (just look at the changing of the guard whenever a new government is voted in, or when a a new network executive takes over and axes the TV shows greenlit by a predecessor). So if it is a coinflip between cutting bait or continuing to invest in a failed draft pick by a predecessor, the underwhelming player usually isn't favored.
A high draft slot is no protection, nor should it be, since you can now judge them by the body of their work, like with Anthony Bennett or Thomas Robinson. Sometimes a change in environment and further development works (many guys cut early found new life and a resurgence later in their career), sometimes it doesn't.