GT Jan 5th: Charlotte @ Minnesota 8:00pm

Post #161 » by **Diop** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:20 am

Foye wrote:
fatlever wrote:man that was a quiet 17 for love. dude is awesome.

If you factor in that he let Diaw light him up as well it's not that awesome anymore.

Don't underestimate Diaw's offensive ability, when he has it going he can be bloody hard to stop. Thats why he is such a frustrating player, some days he looks like an allstar, other days he looks asleep.

Post #162 » by **Klomp** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:24 am

Foye wrote:
fatlever wrote:man that was a quiet 17 for love. dude is awesome.

If you factor in that he let Diaw light him up as well it's not that awesome anymore.

I was actually pleased with the majority of Love's defensive effort.

doc.end · Post #163 » by **doc.end** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:25 am

Sachmo wrote:
Foye wrote:
fatlever wrote:man that was a quiet 17 for love. dude is awesome.

If you factor in that he let Diaw light him up as well it's not that awesome anymore.

Don't underestimate Diaw's offensive ability, when he has it going he can be bloody hard to stop. Thats why he is such a frustrating player, some days he looks like an allstar, other days he looks asleep.

That's just catball

Foye · Post #164 » by **Foye** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:26 am

Sachmo wrote:
Foye wrote:
fatlever wrote:man that was a quiet 17 for love. dude is awesome.

If you factor in that he let Diaw light him up as well it's not that awesome anymore.

Don't underestimate Diaw's offensive ability, when he has it going he can be bloody hard to stop. Thats why he is such a frustrating player, some days he looks like an allstar, other days he looks asleep.

Still it sucks to see that Love gives effort on one end of the court and completely sucks on the other end. Defensively, he's really bad today. And Flynn is sucking it up as well. It's almost like an alien from space jam took away all his basketball skills.

Post #165 » by **BigSlam** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:26 am

Our entire team has boxed out SO well on the boards tonight.

I love it.

Post #166 » by **fatlever** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:27 am

dj.... WAKE UP

Post #167 » by **BigSlam** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:28 am

He's taking good shots. Just not hitting them.

captaincrunk · Post #168 » by **captaincrunk** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:29 am

These announcers keep calling Gerald Henderson by the name Wallace.

Post #169 » by **BigSlam** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:29 am

Kwame just wants loose balls more than anyone else on the floor.

Kid is a wrecking ball out there chasing them down.

Post #170 » by **BigSlam** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:31 am

BTW - anyone else notice we only had 3 turn overs AS A TEAM for the entire 1st half?

Interesting.

Post #171 » by **Klomp** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:31 am

captaincrunk wrote:These announcers keep calling Gerald Henderson by the name Wallace.

That was the first I noticed it.

Post #172 » by **fatlever** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:31 am

captaincrunk wrote:
BigSlam wrote:How much is Kwame getting paid this season?

Vet minimum right? Lols. Too bad he wasn't doing this 8 years ago.

kwame was decent 8 years ago... people just had expectations of him being a superstar. he isnt worth a lottery pick or a big contract, but as a cheap vet, he's a nice big man to have.

like slam hinting, i would rather have kwame at 1 mil than okafor at 10 mil.

Post #173 » by **fatlever** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:32 am

BigSlam wrote:BTW - anyone else notice we only had 3 turn overs AS A TEAM for the entire 1st half?

Interesting.

ball movement good, turnover down, diaw playing better all directly related to jax being out.

i wont take away what jax does for us. we dont have anyone who can score like he can especially in isos, but man he really has a lot of baggage.

doc.end · Post #174 » by **doc.end** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:33 am

BigSlam wrote:BTW - anyone else notice we only had 3 turn overs AS A TEAM for the entire 1st half?

Interesting.

Yup, I noticed we shot the same FG% as them but were up by double digits, so check how it is we had so many more possesions. Interestingand a good sign. Of course part of it is - Jax is not playing.

Post #175 » by **fatlever** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:33 am

fatlever wrote:
BigSlam wrote:BTW - anyone else notice we only had 3 turn overs AS A TEAM for the entire 1st half?

Interesting.

ball movement good, turnover down, diaw playing better all directly related to jax being out.

i wont take away what jax does for us. we dont have anyone who can score like he can especially in isos, but man he really has a lot of baggage.

all that being said, if this game gets close in the 4th, without jax, how will we score?

Post #176 » by **fatlever** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:34 am

and here comes the run

Post #177 » by **BigSlam** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:34 am

fatlever wrote:
BigSlam wrote:BTW - anyone else notice we only had 3 turn overs AS A TEAM for the entire 1st half?

Interesting.

ball movement good, turnover down, diaw playing better all directly related to jax being out.

i wont take away what jax does for us. we dont have anyone who can score like he can especially in isos, but man he really has a lot of baggage.

That's why Nick Young would be perfect for us.

bobcats3wallace · Post #178 » by **bobcats3wallace** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:34 am

Not taking smart shots here...are we goign to see a 2nd half let down again...my god. Looks like it.

captaincrunk · Post #179 » by **captaincrunk** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:34 am

Goddamn this third quarter "refusal to make shots" that every single one of our players has.

Marvel · Post #180 » by **Marvel** » Thu Jan 6, 2011 2:34 am

Guys i'm watching the Celtis game....what up with DJ....1-10. Result of bad shots, not falling, no confidence, end of shot clock shots?