Walt Cronkite wrote:Surprised to read so many negative reactions. Seems to me like we switched two guys that didn't fit for one guy that probably will and costs 1 or 2 mill more. While he's overpaid, we have a lot of friendly deals, so I don't think that hurts so bad. How terrible did everyone say Belinelli was when we made that trade? If this guy can replicate what Cody does, we just got a lot better. Hawes was a fun player and will be missed.
Exactly. We consolidated two AWFUL players into one that fits perfectly schematically.
Its a bit of a risk because he may not rebound his career in charlotte, but really you can just look at it as a 2/$26 deal.
This year's salary obviously doesnt matter.
Next year's salary doesnt matter either due to our salary cap circumstances. We werent getting anyone good for the pittance we could offer under the cap. In fact, by getting our MLE back we may be able to offer slightly more.
Year 3 does matter and by then it may look like good or bad value who knows.
Year 4 hes an expiring deal so he may prove useful in a trade if hes not productive.
With the cap going up expiring deals were not as valuable as normal. You cant expect teams to give up great players for expiring deals this year.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------Hinkie has created a monster that will awaken in 2018 precisely 200 years after Mary Shelley published Frankenstein in 1818 A.D.
I don't think for a second this is coincidental as Hinkie is well educated and a fan of Classic British Lit