predators wrote:CatgutStitches wrote:Yeah, theres no way a guy the size of Draymond Green could guard todays 4's....

I get the skepticism about his length, but I just don't think its that big of a deal. He's just as strong as Draymond coming out of college and he's WAAAAY more athletic and explosive. I'm not saying he will be a defensive stalwart, but he has plenty of tools, not to mention those same players have to figure out how to guard him on offense. Do I wish he was 6'10"? sure, but hes not. I don't know why, I just have a good feeling about him, and I LOVE his fit with Monk. I'm a big fan of positional versatility.
Draymond Green's wingspan is 7'1". I don't think it's a good comparison at all.
Way to edit you calling it "dumb" lol. So a couple inches in standing reach and a few inches of wingspan is not made up for by the vast difference in athleticism, in fact they are still so much more important that the comparison is "dumb". OK, just making sure. Why doesn't everyone just draft only tall guys with long arms and not bother with anyone else? They are clearly wasting their time.
He's not overly quick, but he certainly isn't slow. He's far more athletic than most 4's in the NBA I'd say. He's not ideal to put on a wing on the perimeter, but MKG is and how has that worked out? He's plenty big and quick enough to switch on anyone. I don't think he will ever be an all NBA defender, but I don't think it will be a glaring weakness either. I also think his offense will make up for it. The Draymond reference was simply for their size, it is simply overblown.
The fact is, we don't know how anyone is going to turn out, but to be all down in the dumps about a guy because hes short for the traditional image of his likely position is kind of silly. But whatever, if you guys want to be all doom and gloom have at it, I'm just ready to enjoy some dunks and 3 pointers.