ImageImage

Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1

Moderators: JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever

User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,236
And1: 4,551
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1781 » by raferfenix » Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:51 am

Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:* Dellavedova ... poor value for a pick but IMHO that's what the Bucks would want


Interested if the Hornets are interested in Delly.

Don't think it'd take a first round pick either -- rather just better fitting players.

Bucks have a log jam in the backcourt (Bledsoe / Brogdon / Snell) while desperately needing help on the boards.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,593
And1: 14,288
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1782 » by HornetJail » Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:50 am

yosemiteben wrote:I wouldn't trade Batum for an expiring straight up, and definitely wouldn't attach an asset to him to do that.

I'm with you that I wouldn't attach much in terms of assets in order to move him, since I believe he'll get back to his old self once he's actually healed up from this elbow issue (whether that's later this year or next season) but if we can trade him for someone who doesn't completely suck, fits the team, and is cheaper (preferably expiring in 2018 or 2019, since that doesn't affect our cap space in the slightest), I think I'd do it. I think Lamb's ready to slide into that starting SG role. If George Hill is attainable, that's my #1 option.
investigate Adam Silver
Topofthekey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,732
And1: 1,885
Joined: Nov 18, 2017
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1783 » by Topofthekey » Thu Jan 18, 2018 3:13 pm

Would Hornets do something like:

Hornets give: Kemba, Marv
Pacers give: Thad Young, TJ Leaf, Joe Young, Elfrid Payton, '18 2nd

Assuming Pacers acquired Elfrid from an earlier trade.

Thad's an upgrade over Marv, on a shorter contract too. If he fits in, re-sign him. If he doesn't fit in, let him walk and gain the savings in cap space.

Leaf, Elfrid, Joe Young, and the 2nd aren't exactly blue-chip building blocks, that much is true. But they are still young with plenty of upside.

Thoughts?
Lwcasu
Pro Prospect
Posts: 843
And1: 322
Joined: Apr 10, 2014
Location: China
         

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1784 » by Lwcasu » Thu Jan 18, 2018 3:49 pm

Topofthekey wrote:Would Hornets do something like:

Hornets give: Kemba, Marv
Pacers give: Thad Young, TJ Leaf, Joe Young, Elfrid Payton, '18 2nd

Assuming Pacers acquired Elfrid from an earlier trade.

Thad's an upgrade over Marv, on a shorter contract too. If he fits in, re-sign him. If he doesn't fit in, let him walk and gain the savings in cap space.

Leaf, Elfrid, Joe Young, and the 2nd aren't exactly blue-chip building blocks, that much is true. But they are still young with plenty of upside.

Thoughts?


This is possibly one of the worst trade proposals I've seen for Kemba. And no, that isn't an upgrade over Marv.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,593
And1: 14,288
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1785 » by HornetJail » Thu Jan 18, 2018 4:41 pm

Topofthekey wrote:Would Hornets do something like:

Hornets give: Kemba, Marv
Pacers give: Thad Young, TJ Leaf, Joe Young, Elfrid Payton, '18 2nd

Assuming Pacers acquired Elfrid from an earlier trade.

Thad's an upgrade over Marv, on a shorter contract too. If he fits in, re-sign him. If he doesn't fit in, let him walk and gain the savings in cap space.

Leaf, Elfrid, Joe Young, and the 2nd aren't exactly blue-chip building blocks, that much is true. But they are still young with plenty of upside.

Thoughts?

This trade is so incredibly far off the mark, I don't even know where to begin.
investigate Adam Silver
Vanderbilt_Grad
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,025
And1: 1,781
Joined: Sep 22, 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1786 » by Vanderbilt_Grad » Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:19 pm

Seems like other teams miss how sneaky good Marv has been this year.

And yeah, that trade does nothing for me.
My picks:
2020 Draft (3rd pick) - Tyrese Haliburton, Devin Vassell, or Onyeka Okongwu
2021 Draft (11th pick) - Moses Moody
User avatar
-Ian-
Analyst
Posts: 3,101
And1: 860
Joined: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Philippines
Contact:
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1787 » by -Ian- » Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:33 pm

Topofthekey wrote:Would Hornets do something like:

Hornets give: Kemba, Marv
Pacers give: Thad Young, TJ Leaf, Joe Young, Elfrid Payton, '18 2nd

Assuming Pacers acquired Elfrid from an earlier trade.

Thad's an upgrade over Marv, on a shorter contract too. If he fits in, re-sign him. If he doesn't fit in, let him walk and gain the savings in cap space.

Leaf, Elfrid, Joe Young, and the 2nd aren't exactly blue-chip building blocks, that much is true. But they are still young with plenty of upside.

Thoughts?

If this forum has -1 feature, your post would receive a lot of negatives.
User avatar
Benjamin Linus
Veteran
Posts: 2,596
And1: 1,292
Joined: May 22, 2008

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1788 » by Benjamin Linus » Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:19 pm

I usually give posters from other forums the benefit of doubt, cause I wouldn't be following the Hornets much either, but Topofthekey's post should go into the HOF. Do we still have that?
stinger14
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 769
Joined: Jan 11, 2014
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1789 » by stinger14 » Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:59 pm

Topofthekey wrote:Would Hornets do something like:

Hornets give: Kemba, Marv
Pacers give: Thad Young, TJ Leaf, Joe Young, Elfrid Payton, '18 2nd

Assuming Pacers acquired Elfrid from an earlier trade.

Thad's an upgrade over Marv, on a shorter contract too. If he fits in, re-sign him. If he doesn't fit in, let him walk and gain the savings in cap space.

Leaf, Elfrid, Joe Young, and the 2nd aren't exactly blue-chip building blocks, that much is true. But they are still young with plenty of upside.

Thoughts?


LMAO....
We can trade you Batum for Oladipo and Turner too
User avatar
2Mas
Head Coach
Posts: 7,260
And1: 4,044
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1790 » by 2Mas » Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:10 pm

yosemiteben wrote:I wouldn't trade Batum for an expiring straight up, and definitely wouldn't attach an asset to him to do that.

I wouldn't attach an asset to him neither, but why wouldn't you just clear him off? That's wild. You have no cap, no additional picks, not enough upside.

I just don't get what the point of keeping this team together.

I mean I had you guys a 6 seed coming into this year. so I thought you guys were gonna have a pretty good year. But it's looking like that 48 win season was the outlier when i thought that was going to be usual. Why would you not want to get Batum's 75+mil off your books for the next 3 years?

Ik your front office doesn't have the best developmental program, but fighting for 40 wins yearly isn't doing anything.
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,881
And1: 16,887
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1791 » by Liver_Pooty » Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:23 pm

Topofthekey wrote:Would Hornets do something like:

Hornets give: Kemba, Marv
Pacers give: Thad Young, TJ Leaf, Joe Young, Elfrid Payton, '18 2nd

Assuming Pacers acquired Elfrid from an earlier trade.

Thad's an upgrade over Marv, on a shorter contract too. If he fits in, re-sign him. If he doesn't fit in, let him walk and gain the savings in cap space.

Leaf, Elfrid, Joe Young, and the 2nd aren't exactly blue-chip building blocks, that much is true. But they are still young with plenty of upside.

Thoughts?



Were talking about Kemba Walker, not Austin Rivers.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,376
And1: 15,586
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: RE: Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1792 » by yosemiteben » Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:50 pm

2Mas wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:I wouldn't trade Batum for an expiring straight up, and definitely wouldn't attach an asset to him to do that.

I wouldn't attach an asset to him neither, but why wouldn't you just clear him off? That's wild.

Because we're way over the cap and dumping his salary wouldn't give us any more flexibility. What's the point?
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,593
And1: 14,288
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: RE: Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1793 » by HornetJail » Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:06 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
2Mas wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:I wouldn't trade Batum for an expiring straight up, and definitely wouldn't attach an asset to him to do that.

I wouldn't attach an asset to him neither, but why wouldn't you just clear him off? That's wild.

Because we're way over the cap and dumping his salary wouldn't give us any more flexibility. What's the point?

it would in 2019, I think that's what he's getting at.
investigate Adam Silver
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,549
And1: 9,319
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1794 » by Braggins » Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:13 am

Our front office would be crazy to turn down an opportunity to get out of Batums contract without having to give up any other assets. Even if he gets back to last years form he doesn't even come close to justifying his contract. We are going to be paying him 27 million in 2021. That is superstar money for a guy who is, at best, a 5th/6th best player on a good team. The market has corrected itself since the offseason we signed Batum and it has turned his contract into one of the worst albatross in the league.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,376
And1: 15,586
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1795 » by yosemiteben » Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:23 am

MotorKeepsGoing wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:
2Mas wrote:I wouldn't attach an asset to him neither, but why wouldn't you just clear him off? That's wild.

Because we're way over the cap and dumping his salary wouldn't give us any more flexibility. What's the point?

it would in 2019, I think that's what he's getting at.
In combination with other guys coming off, right? Reality is we're not going to have close to the same amount of salary available if we go under the cap.
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1796 » by mrknowitall215 » Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:03 am

Looks like Cavs fans on the Twittersphere are trying to configure a way to acquire Lamb without using the Brooklyn pick
Image
User avatar
mlloyd10
General Manager
Posts: 8,090
And1: 963
Joined: Jan 18, 2012
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1797 » by mlloyd10 » Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:02 am

Thoughts on a Middleton/telly for Howard/Monk

Or Middleton/Vaughn for MKG/Monk
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,549
And1: 9,319
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1798 » by Braggins » Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:02 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:Looks like Cavs fans on the Twittersphere are trying to configure a way to acquire Lamb without using the Brooklyn pick

Hard to see that happening. The Brooklyn pick is too much value for Lamb, but they dont have any other assets that would be worth enough that theyd be willkng to part with. Maybe some kind of IT/Lamb swap, but that seems iffy for both sides. We cant afford to resign IT and swapping him for Lamb probably doesnt move the needle for the Cavs.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,593
And1: 14,288
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1799 » by HornetJail » Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:17 am

Braggins wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:Looks like Cavs fans on the Twittersphere are trying to configure a way to acquire Lamb without using the Brooklyn pick

Hard to see that happening. The Brooklyn pick is too much value for Lamb, but they dont have any other assets that would be worth enough that theyd be willkng to part with. Maybe some kind of IT/Lamb swap, but that seems iffy for both sides. We cant afford to resign IT and swapping him for Lamb probably doesnt move the needle for the Cavs.

Maybe a Howard+Lamb for a load of **** contracts + BRK pick has merits. If they want to turn Thompson + Shumpert into useful players, I think that's the price. I sure wouldn't do it for any other pick they have.

That's really a "we give up" move on our end though and we probably would have things lined up for Kemba and Marvin if we did that.
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread 16/17 pt.1 

Post#1800 » by catch20two » Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:49 am

Braggins wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:Looks like Cavs fans on the Twittersphere are trying to configure a way to acquire Lamb without using the Brooklyn pick

Hard to see that happening. The Brooklyn pick is too much value for Lamb, but they dont have any other assets that would be worth enough that theyd be willkng to part with. Maybe some kind of IT/Lamb swap, but that seems iffy for both sides. We cant afford to resign IT and swapping him for Lamb probably doesnt move the needle for the Cavs.

I’m sure Clifford wouldn’t mind Shumpert over Lamb. At least he plays defense.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)

Return to Charlotte Hornets