ball teacher wrote:PacerNation24 wrote:ball teacher wrote:
Lance wasn't their most talented player, but he was their best player and the player with the most heart. Losin him is a big blow. There will probably be at least 4 teams better than Indy in the east next year, at least.
Did you just call Lance our best player...
By seasons end Lance was the heart and soul of your team. Not the best scorer, not the most talented, but of all the things he brought the table nobody on the Pacers was more valuable. Not Hibbert, not Paul George who went from being a borderline superstar to just being called a good player, and not D West who's showing signs of slowing. Do I think he's better than Paul George, not really, but at the end of the season, I think he clearly overachieved and played better than George.
I am sorry, but you really need to watch some more Pacers games before jumping to that conclusion. At the end of the season, Lance was the most hated Pacer inside the locker room. As more and more quotes and "sources" come out and continue to come out, you can make an argument the reason we lost our way was because of Lance. And you say Paul George just became a good player? PG averaged 23/8/4 on 44% shooting in the playoffs, he is our best player and to be honest, it wasn't even close. Also, from the perspective of a Pacers fan, heart and soul of our team can only be attributed to David West, he is our leader, he is the guy who keeps everyone in line. Our coach has called him our middle linebacker, and heart and soul so many times its not even funny, and Lance was probably 4th or 5th in line for that role.
Again, you say at the end of the season Lance overachieved and played better than George, I call bull once again. Lance was better the first half of the season than the second half. He played within our offense, was a team first player, and did all the little things a good team needs. However, once Lance preformed well and Vogel started to shift the offense to feature him just a bit more, thats when the bad Lance came, and the Lance you keep saying overachieved. Lance turned into to a me first scorer, a ball dominate wing, who at times would just flat out refuse to pass the ball, and would keep trying to be the go-to guy on our team, when it was clear as day that guy had to be Paul George. Thats where the locker room troubles happened, Lance kept trying to be the guy, and turned into a ball dominant selfish player, Hibbert didn't like it (and said things to the media he shouldn't have, which made it worse) Hill didn't like it, and then the locker room split.
Look Lance is a good player, and can be a very good player, but he was not out best player, and fields the most blame for the collapse of our team last season. Lance was great for us the first half, PG was a superstar, Lance was a team first all-around good player, and D-West was our second option. Once the second half came, Lance was all about himself and stats, he wanted to prove he could be the man, he would steal rebounds, hold the ball for 20 seconds, refuse to pass, and now its becoming clear he was a big locker room issue. The bottom line is Lance isn't on George's level and he isn't close, he can't score as well, defend as well, and may be a slightly better passer at best, and brings a lot more baggage than PG. D-West is also a better scorer and was our leader, and as you said, West was our true "heart and soul" of our team. I remain firm in my stance that Lance can be a very very good player, but right now he isn't there, and he has a lot of work to be done, and shouldn't even be in the discussion if he is as good as Paul George, let alone even on the same level as him.
Saying Lance isn't on the same level as PG isn't an insult either, I consider PG to be a top 10, top 15 player at worst in the NBA.




































